Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
The offensive in naval war, as has been said, is the function of the
sea-going navy—of the battleships, and of the cruisers of various sizes
and purposes, including sea-going torpedo-vessels capable of
accompanying a fleet, without impeding its movements by their loss of
speed or unseaworthiness. Seaworthiness, and reasonable speed under all
weather conditions, are qualities necessary to every constituent of a
fleet; but, over and above these, the backbone and real power of any
navy are the vessels which, by due proportion of defensive and offensive
powers, are capable of taking and giving hard knocks. All others are but
subservient to these, and exist only for them.
What is that strength to be? Ships answering to this description are the
_kind_ which make naval strength; what is to be its _degree_? What their
number? The answer—a broad formula—is that it must be great enough to
take the sea, and to fight, with reasonable chances of success, the
largest force likely to be brought against it, as shown by calculations
which have been indicated previously. Being, as we claim, and as our
past history justifies us in claiming, a nation indisposed to
aggression, unwilling to extend our possessions or our interests by war,
the measure of strength we set ourselves depends, necessarily, not upon
our projects of aggrandizement, but upon the disposition of others to
thwart what we consider our reasonable policy, which they may not so
consider. When they resist, what force can they bring against us? That
force must be naval; we have no exposed point upon which land
operations, decisive in character, can be directed. This is the kind of
the hostile force to be apprehended. What may its size be? There is the
measure of our needed strength. The calculation may be intricate, the
conclusion only approximate and probable, but it is the nearest reply we
can reach. So many ships of such and such sizes, so many guns, so much
ammunition—in short, so much naval material.
In the material provisions that have been summarized under the two chief
heads of defense and offense—in coast defense under its three principal
requirements, guns, lines of stationary torpedoes, and torpedo-boats,
and in a navy able to keep the sea in the presence of a probable
enemy—consist what may be called most accurately preparations for war.
In so far as the United States is short in them, she is at the mercy of
an enemy whose naval strength is greater than that of her own available
navy. If her navy cannot keep the enemy off the coast, blockade at least
is possible. If, in addition, there are no harbor torpedo-boats,
blockade is easy. If, further, guns and torpedo lines are deficient,
bombardment comes within the range of possibility, and may reach even
the point of entire feasibility. There will be no time for preparation
after war begins.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account