Malthus, T. R. (Thomas Robert), 1766-1834; Malthusianism
towns at the expense of the country. If Goldsmith’s _Deserted Village_
is not English, it is not Irish. By the year 1780, when Lord North from
fear of rebellion granted free trade to Ireland with Great Britain, the
mischief had been made almost incurable. The great increase in the Irish
population, like the great increase in the English, may be said to begin
in a free trade movement. In the worst days of legal persecution it
might have been said of the Irish Catholic population, the more they
were afflicted the more they multiplied and grew. Lavergne[445] thinks
their greater increase was due first to the physiological law, that in
the case of all animals the means of reproduction are multiplied in
proportion to the chances of destruction[?], and second to the
instinctively sound tactics of a people otherwise defenceless. The
probability is, too, that they remained quiet under their multitudinous
industrial, political, and religious disqualifications so long, because
they were reduced to that depth of misery that kills the very power of
resistance; and poverty at its extreme point is a positive but not a
preventive check on population. Where things are so bad, marriage, it is
thought, cannot make them worse, and marriage would go on at the expense
of a high mortality, general pauperism, or continuous emigration. The
pureness of marriage relations in Ireland, though in itself a much
greater good than its consequences were evil, acted as it would have
done in Godwin’s Utopia;[446] apart from wisdom, virtue itself had its
evils. Potatoes by-and-by came into general use; and the bad harvests,
which taught even the Scotch and English poor[447] to make frequent use
of this substitute for corn, converted it in Ireland from a substitute
into a staple. Economists viewed this change with almost unanimous
disapproval. In the view of Malthus it was the cheapness of this food
that made it dangerous for the labourers; his theory of wages led him to
object to cheap corn on the same grounds.[448] On the principle that it
needs difficulties to generate energy, the Irish are made indolent by
their cheap food, and make no use of it except to increase by it. Living
on the cheapest food procurable, they could not in scarcity fall back on
anything else. Every man who wished to marry might obtain a cabin and
potatoes.[449] At the lowest calculation, an acre of land planted with
potatoes will support twice as much as one of the same quality sown with
wheat.[450] There are other objections to a potato diet. It is a simple
(as opposed to a composite) diet, and it involves a low standard of
comfort. The second is not the same as the first, for a people that had
no variety in their food might conceivably have a great variety in their
other comforts. As a matter of fact, however, it was none of these three
supposed disadvantages of the potato that proved the bane of the Irish
population, but a fourth one, its liability to blight.[451]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account