Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human ActionMarsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Science
Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action
Marsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Conservation of natural resources; Human geography; Nature -- Effect of human beings on; Physical geography
Moritz Wagner, as quoted by Wittwer,[264] remarks in his description of
Mount Ararat: "A singular phenomenon to which my guide drew my attention
is the appearance of several plants on the earth-heaps left by the last
catastrophe [an earthquake], which grow nowhere else on the mountain,
and had never been observed in this region before. The seeds of these
plants were probably brought by birds, and found in the loose, clayey
soil remaining from the streams of mud, the conditions of growth which
the other soil of the mountain refused them." This is probable enough,
but it is hardly less so that the flowing mud brought them up to the
influence of air and sun, from depths where a previous convulsion had
buried them ages before. Seeds of small sylvan plants, too deeply buried
by successive layers of forest foliage and the mould resulting from its
decomposition to be reached by the plough when the trees are gone and
the ground brought under cultivation, may, if a wiser posterity replants
the wood which sheltered their parent stems, germinate and grow, after
lying for generations in a state of suspended animation.
Darwin says: "In Staffordshire, on the estate of a relation, where I had
ample means of investigation, there was a large and extremely barren
heath, which had never been touched by the hand of man, but several
hundred acres of exactly the same nature had been enclosed twenty-five
years previously and planted with Scotch fir. The change in the native
vegetation of the planted part of the heath was most remarkable--more
than is generally seen in passing from one quite different soil to
another; not only the proportional numbers of the heath plants were
wholly changed, but _twelve species_ of plants (not counting grasses and
sedges) flourished in the plantation which could not be found on the
heath."[265] Had the author informed us that these twelve plants
belonged to a species whose seeds enter into the nutriment of the birds
which appeared with the young wood, we could easily account for their
presence in the soil; but he says distinctly that the birds were of
insectivorous species, and it therefore seems more probable that the
seeds had been deposited when an ancient forest protected the growth of
the plants which bore them, and that they sprang up to new life when a
return of favorable conditions awaked them from a sleep of centuries.
Darwin indeed says that the heath "had never been touched by the hand
of man." Perhaps not, after it became a heath; but what evidence is
there to control the general presumption that this heath was preceded by
a forest, in whose shade the vegetables which dropped the seeds in
question might have grown?[266]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account