Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human ActionMarsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Science
Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action
Marsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Conservation of natural resources; Human geography; Nature -- Effect of human beings on; Physical geography
The art, or, as the Continental foresters call it, the science of
sylviculture has been so little pursued in England and America, that its
nomenclature has not been introduced into the English vocabulary, and I
shall not be able to describe its processes with technical propriety of
language, without occasionally borrowing a word from the forest
literature of France and Germany. A full discussion of the methods of
sylviculture would, indeed, be out of place in a work like the present,
but the almost total want of conveniently accessible means of
information on the subject, in English-speaking countries, will justify
me in presenting it with somewhat more of detail than would otherwise be
pertinent.
The two best known methods are those distinguished as the _taillis_,
copse or coppice treatment,[294] and the _futaie_, for which I find no
English equivalent, but which may not inappropriately be called the
_full-growth_ system. A _taillis_, copse, or coppice, is a wood composed
of shoots from the roots of trees previously cut for fuel and timber.
The shoots are thinned out from time to time, and finally cut, either
after a fixed number of years, or after the young trees have attained to
certain dimensions, their roots being then left to send out a new
progeny as before. This is the cheapest method of management, and
therefore the best wherever the price of labor and of capital bears a
high proportion to that of land and of timber; but it is essentially a
wasteful economy. If the woodland is, in the first place, completely cut
over, as is found most convenient in practice, the young shoots have
neither the shade nor the protection from wind so important to forest
growth, and their progress is comparatively slow, while, at the same
time, the thick clumps they form choke the seedlings that may have
sprouted near them. If domestic animals of any species are allowed to
roam in the wood, they browse upon the terminal buds and the tender
branches, thereby stunting, if they do not kill, the young trees, and
depriving them of all beauty and vigor of growth. The evergreens, once
cut, do not shoot up again,[295] and the mixed character of the
forest--in many respects an important advantage, if not an indispensable
condition of growth--is lost;[296] and besides this, large wood of any
species cannot be grown in this method, because trees which shoot from
decaying stumps and their dying roots, become hollow or otherwise
unsound before they acquire their full dimensions. A more fatal
objection still, is, that the roots of trees will not bear more than two
or three, or at most four cuttings of their shoots before their vitality
is exhausted, and the wood can then be restored only by replanting
entirely. The period of cutting coppices varies in Europe from fifteen
to forty years, according to soil, species, and rapidity of growth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account