Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human ActionMarsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Science
Man and Nature; Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action
Marsh, George P. (George Perkins)
Conservation of natural resources; Human geography; Nature -- Effect of human beings on; Physical geography
I am convinced that forests would soon cover many parts of the Arabian
and African deserts, if man and domestic animals, especially the goat
and the camel, were banished from them. The hard palate and tongue and
strong teeth and jaws of this latter quadruped enable him to break off
and masticate tough and thorny branches as large as the finger. He is
particularly fond of the smaller twigs, leaves, and seedpods of the
_sont_ and other acacias, which, like the American Robinia, thrive well
on dry and sandy soils, and he spares no tree the branches of which are
within his reach, except, if I remember right, the tamarisk that
produces manna. Young trees sprout plentifully around the springs and
along the winter watercourses of the desert, and these are just the
halting stations of the caravans and their routes of travel. In the
shade of these trees, annual grasses and perennial shrubs shoot up, but
are mown down by the hungry cattle of the Bedouin, as fast as they grow.
A few years of undisturbed vegetation would suffice to cover such points
with groves, and these would gradually extend themselves over soils
where now scarcely any green thing but the bitter colocynth and the
poisonous foxglove is ever seen.
_The Forest does not Furnish Food for Man._
In a region absolutely covered with trees, human life could not long be
sustained, for want of animal and vegetable food. The depths of the
forest seldom furnish either bulb or fruit suited to the nourishment of
man; and the fowls and beasts on which he feeds are scarcely seen except
upon the margin of the wood, for here only grow the shrubs and grasses,
and here only are found the seeds and insects, which form the sustenance
of the non-carnivorous birds and quadrupeds.[117]
_First Removal of the Forest._
As soon as multiplying man had filled the open grounds along the margin
of the rivers, the lakes, and the sea, and sufficiently peopled the
natural meadows and savannas of the interior, where such existed,[118]
he could find room for expansion and further growth, only by the
removal of a portion of the forest that hemmed him in. The destruction
of the woods, then, was man's first geographical conquest, his first
violation of the harmonies of inanimate nature.
Primitive man had little occasion to fell trees for fuel, or, for the
construction of dwellings, boats, and the implements of his rude
agriculture and handicrafts. Windfalls would furnish a thin population
with a sufficient supply of such material, and if occasionally a growing
tree was cut, the injury to the forest would be too insignificant to be
at all appreciable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account