Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilizationAlexander, F. Matthias (Frederick Matthias)
Science
Man's supreme inheritance : $b Conscious guidance and control in relation to human evolution in civilization
The conscious guidance and control advocated here is on a wide and
general, and not on a specific basis. Conscious control applied in a
specific way in unthinkable, except as a result of the principle
primarily applied as a universal. For instance, the conscious
controlling of the movements of a particular muscle or limb, as
practised by athletes and others, is of little practical value in the
science of living. The specific control of a finger, of the neck, or of
the legs should primarily be the result of the conscious guidance and
control of the mechanism of the torso, particularly of the antagonistic
muscular actions which bring about those correct and greater
co-ordinations intended to control the movements of the limbs, neck,
respiratory mechanism and the general activity of the internal organs.
In order to describe the teaching method necessary in this connexion, I
will indicate the procedure which should be adopted in the attempt to
help a pupil in whom undue tension of the muscles of one side of the
neck causes the head to be pulled down on that side. In the ordinary
way, the pupil is told to relax and straighten the neck and he and his
teacher devote themselves to this end. This attempt may be attended with
more or less success, chiefly less. If they do succeed in removing the
specific trouble it is almost certain that new defects will have been
cultivated during the process. In any case the teacher’s order to relax
and straighten the neck is incorrect and primarily the result of a wrong
assumption. It started from a false premise which led to false
deductions. The pupil and his teacher decided that something was wrong
and that therefore something specific had to be done to put it right.
The “end” was held in mind primarily and not the “means whereby.”
The correct point of view is: Something is wrong in the use of the
psycho-physical mechanism of the person concerned. Is this imperfection
or defect a direct or indirect result of this person’s own direction and
action, or is it the result of some influence outside of himself and
beyond his power to control? It can be proved conclusively that his
imperfections or defects are due entirely to causes springing directly
or indirectly from his own ideas and acts.
It is therefore obvious that the correct order of procedure for teacher
and pupil is first for the pupil to learn to prevent himself from doing
the wrong things which cause the imperfections or defects, and then, as
a _secondary_ consideration in procedure, to learn the correct way to
use the mental and physical mechanisms concerned.
If there is any undue muscular pull in any part of the neck, it is
almost certain to be due to the defective co-ordination in the use of
the muscles of the spine, back, and torso generally, the correction of
which means the eradication of the real cause of the trouble.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account