This becomes a very comprehensive fact if we approach and analyse the mathematical processes as some branch (_M_) of the time-binding process, which they are; then this process at once becomes impersonal and cosmic, because of the time-binding involved in it, no matter what _time_ is (if there is such a thing as time). Is the succession of cosmos, bios, logos, time-binding taking us right back to cosmos again? Now if we put _psychological_ axioms into the time-binding apparatus, it will thrash out the results _correctly_, but whether the results are _true_ is another question. To be able to talk about these problems I have to introduce three new definitions, which are introduced only for practical purposes. It may happen that after some rewording these definitions may become scientific. I will try to define “truth” and for this purpose I will divide the concept “truth” into three types: (1) Psychological, or private, or relative truth, by which I will mean such conceptions of the truth as any one person possesses, but different from other types of truth (α1, α2, ... αn) (2) Scientific truth (αs), by which I will mean a psychological truth when it is approved by the time-binding faculties or apparatus in the present stage of our development. This scientific truth represents the “bound-up-time” in our present knowledge; and finally, (3) The absolute truth, which will be the _final definition_ of a phenomenon based upon the final knowledge of _primal causation valid in infinity_. For simplicity’s sake I will use the signs α1, α2, ... αn for the “psychological,” “private,” or “relative” truths, between which, for the moment, I will not discriminate. αs1, αs2, ... αsn, will be used for scientific truths, and finally αinfinity for the absolute truth valid in infinity. To make it easier to explain, I will illustrate the suggestions by an example. Let us suppose that the human time-binding capacities or energies in the _organic_ chemistry correspond to radium in the _inorganic_ chemistry; being of course of different dimensions and of absolutely different character. It may happen, for it probably is so, that the complex time-binding energy has many different stages of development and different kinds of “rays” _A_, _B_, _C_, ... _M_.... Let us suppose that the so-called mental capacities are the _M_ rays of the time-binding energy; the “spiritual” capacities, the _A_ rays; the “will” powers, the _B_ rays; and so on. Psychological truths will then be a function of all rays together, namely _A_ _B_ _C_ ... _M_ ... or _f_ (_A_ _B_ _C_ ... _M_ ...), the character of any “truth” in question will largely depend upon which of these elements prevail.