4 Moore, _Popular Science Monthly_, New York, March, 1880; _Zeitschrift für Ethnologie_: Berlin, 1887. 5 “Monuments de Roknia,” p. 18. 6 Haxthausen: “Mém. sur la Russie,” vol. ii., p. 204; A. Bogdanow: “Mat. pour Servir à l’Histoire des Kourganes,” Moscow, 1879; Margaret Stokes: “La Disposition des Principaux Dolmens de l’Irlande,” _Rev. Arch_., July, 1882. 7 Sir A. de Capell Brooke: “Sketches in Spain and Morocco.” 8 Tissot: “Récherches sur la Géographie Comparée de la Mauritanie Tinigitane.” 9 Margaret Stokes: “La Distribution des Principaux Dolmens de l’Irlande.” _Revue Arch_., July, 1882. 10 Sir W. Wilde: “Ireland, Past and Present.” Miss Buckland: “Cornish and Irish Prehistoric Monuments.” _Anth. Inst., Nov_., 1879. O’Curry: “Lectures on the Manuscript Materials of Irish History.” 11 _Bul. Soc. Pol. du Morbihan_, April, 1885. 12 S. Reinach, _Rev. Arch_., 1888. Wilson: “Megalithic Monuments of Brittany.” Cartailhac: “La France Préhistorique,” in which the measurements are given of the principal monuments of Brittany. 13 A. Bertrand: “Archéologie Celtique et Gauloise,” p. 105. 14 Iliad, book xxiii., v. 380. 15 Joshua, chap. iv., v. 13 _et seq_. 16 P. du Chatellier, _Mém_. _Soc. d’Emulation des Côtes-du-Nord_, vol. xix. 17 Cartailhac: “Les Âges Préhistoriques en Espagne et en Portugal.” 18 Verreaux, _L’Anthropologie_, 1890, p. 157. 19 Haxthausen: “Mém. sur la Russie Mér., Vol. ii., p. 204. “Fouilles des Kourganes,” par M. Sarnokoasof, _Revue Arch_., 1879. Much: _Mittheilungen der Anth. Gesell. in Wien_, 1878. 20 On this point see the excellent work by Maury, “Les Monuments de la Russie et les Tumulus Tchoudes,” and Meynier and Eichtal’s “Tumulus des Anciens Habitants de la Sibérie.” 21 _Revue d’ Anth_., 1880, p. 655. 22 _Mém. de la Soc. Arch. de la Province de Constantine_, 1863. 23 “Monuments Mégalithiques de la Tunisie,” _Ant. Afric_., July, 1884. Dr. Rouire: “Les Dolmens de l’Enfida,” _Bull. Geog. Hist_., 1886. 24 “Heth and Noah,” pp. 191 and 192. 25 “Heth and Moab,” p. 249. 26 “Tribes of the Hindoo Koosh,” Calcutta, 1881. 27 _Matériaux_, 1887, p. 458. M. Pallart (“Mon. Meg. de Mascaro”), thinks that this dolmen was not erected by man, but that a long slab of stone has slipped down the slopes of the mountain and rested on two natural supports. It is not easy to accept this view. 28 Dr. de Closmadeuc, agreeing, I think, with Henry Martin, derives the name of _Dol Varchant_ from _Dol March’-Hent_, the table of the horse of the avenue. 29 _Compte rendu_, p. 421. 30 _Mat_., 1877, p. 470. 31 _Ass. Française_, Bordeaux, 1872, p. 725. 32 _Rev. d’Anth_., 1881, p. 283.