Manual of Classical Erotology (De figuris Veneris)
General
Manual of Classical Erotology (De figuris Veneris)
Erotic literature; Sex customs -- Greece; Sex customs -- Rome
There is, however, no need that the middle actor should fornicate or
pedicate. He may be placed between his two companions in such a way that
while he is enduring the assault of a pederast behind, he may in front
irrumate, suck a member or lick a vulva. Hostius whose mind was so
fertile in inventing obscenities that he was held up as an example to
future ages, has tried all these postures and even added fresh
variations. Seneca (_Nat. Quaest._, I., 16) has inveighed against him
more vehemently than is perhaps fit for a philosopher. It seems to me as
though some secret voluptuousness has been acting here on the sense of
this rigid guardian of virtue; he says:
“I will tell you here a story which will show you that lust will not
disdain any artifice which is calculated to rouse desires, and to
stimulate its own fury. The lasciviousness of Hostius was of the
extremest kind. It was this rich miser, this slave of a hundred
million sesterces, whose death, when he had been assassinated by his
slaves, Augustus would not avenge, although he would not say that
they were right to kill him. His lewdness was not contented with one
sex; he was as passionate for men as for women. He had mirrors made
which magnified the reflections so much that a finger appeared as
big as an arm. These mirrors were placed in such a manner that when
he had a man under him he could watch every movement of his
accomplice, and enjoy as it were the fictitious size of his member.
He chose his men carefully, the measuring tape in hand, and still
had to deceive his insatiable passion. It would be too outrageous to
report everything which this monster, that ought to have been torn
into pieces, dared to say and do with his mouth; when surrounded on
all sides by his mirrors he was the spectator of his own turpitudes,
and those secret infamies which every man would deny, if accused of
them, of such he took his fill not with his mouth only, but also
with eyes. And, by Hercules, generally speaking crimes shun their
own reflection; men who are bare of every feeling of honor and
exposed to every insult, still have some sense of shame, and do not
appear as they are. But he feasted his eyes on unheard of and
unknown infamies, and, not content to see simply how he dishonored
himself, he surrounded himself with mirrors, for the sake of
multiplying and grouping his lubricities. As he could not see
unaided everything distinctly when, pedicated by one man, he had his
head between the thighs of another, he saw by his mirrors what he
was doing and how. He saw the lewd work of his mouth, and watched
himself absorbing men by every orifice. Sometimes placed between a
man and a woman, playing both ways the passive part, he was able to
see the greatest abominations. Darkness was not for him! So far from
being afraid of the light of day, he wanted it for his monstrous
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account