[65] See especially W. Wright, _The Empire of the Hittites_,
8vo, 2nd ed., London, 1886; Perrot and Chipiez, _Hist. de l’art
dans l’antiquité_, t. iv., pp. 483 to 812; O. Hirschfeld, _Die
Felsen-reliefs in Kleinasien und das Volk der Hittiter_ (_Abhandlungen
der Berliner Akademie_, 1886).
[66] Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._, t. iv., p. 547.
[67] Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._, t. iv., p. 549.
[68] There is some doubt whether this figure is Hittite at all. It may
be of Babylonian origin. (See Perrot and Chipiez, _Hist._, t. iv., 550
f.) The boots are so slightly turned up at the points that they are
more like those worn by Babylonian kings than the characteristic boots
of the Hittites. The stela was brought from the castle of Birejik, not
from the site of Carchemish, as M. Babelon states.
[69] Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._, t. iv., p. 534.
[70] Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._, t. iv., p. 559.
[71] Perrot and Guillaume, _Exploration archéol. de la Galatie_, etc.,
pl. lxv.
[72] _Hist. de l’art dans l’antiquité,_ t. iv. p. 667.
[73] Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._, t. iv., p. 697.
[74] Perrot and Chipiez, _op cit._, t. iv., p. 713.
[75] Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._, t. iv., p. 750.
[76] S. Reinach, _Rev. Archéol._, 1885 (3 se. t. v.), p. 54, ff.
[77] _Gazette archéol._, 1887 (t. xiii. p. 60).
[78] From Wilson and Warren, _The Recovery of Jerusalem_, p. 298
(1871).
[79] M. de Vogüé, _Le Temple de Jérusalem_, p. 3.
[80] M. de Vogüé, _Le Temple de Jérusalem_, pp. 21 and 22.
[81] This name is at present given to a building which has nothing
in common with this door of the Temple.--M. de Vogüé, _Le Temple de
Jérusalem_, p. 12, note.
[82] A, Ophel.--B, Bridge.--C,
Tyropœon.--D, Causeway.--E, Tower of Baris
or Antonia.--F, Portico.--G, Court of the
Gentiles.--H, Court of the women.--K, Court
of Israel.--L, Altar of burnt-offerings.--M,
Court of the priests.--N, Solomon’s porch. O,
Moat called _Birket Israîl_. PP, Double gate and triple
gate.--Q, Golden gate.--R, Kedron valley.
[83] M. de Vogüé, _Le Temple_, p. 56.
[84] M. de Vogüé, _Le Temple_, p. 37.
[85] M. de Vogüé, _Le Temple_, p. 58.
[86] 1 Kings vii. 49-50.
[87] Procopius, _De Bello Vandalico_, ii., chap. 9; Theophanes,
_Chronographia_, p. 168, and Georg. Cedrenus, _Hist. Comp._, p. 606
(Ed. Bonn, 1833)
[88] M. de Vogüé, _Le Temple_, p. 34; Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._,
t. iv. p. 315 ff.
[89] Perrot and Chipiez, _op. cit._, t. iv., p. 463.
[90] Renan, _Mission de Phénicie_ pl. 10
[91] See Perrot and Chipiez, _History of Art in Phœnicia and its
Dependencies_, vol. i., p. 193 [Eng. Ed.].
[92] Renan, _Mission de Phénicie_, p. 411.
[93] Perrot and Chipiez, _History of Art in Phœnicia_, vol. ii., p. 12.
[94] See Perrot and Chipiez, _History of Art in Phœnicia, etc._, vol.
ii., p. 123
[95] Perrot and Chipiez, _History of Art in Phœnicia, etc._, vol. ii.,
p. 148 f.
[96] Pliny, _Hist. Nat._, xxxvi. 67.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account