The queen (Fig. 14), although referred to as the mother bee, was called
the king by Virgil, Pliny, and by writers as late as the last century,
though in the ancient "Bee Master's Farewell," by John Hall, published
in London in 1796, I find an admirable description of the queen bee,
with her function correctly stated. Réaumur as quoted by "Wildman on
Bees," published in London in 1770, says "this third sort has a grave
and sedate walk, is armed with a sting, and is mother of all the
others."
Huber, to whom every apiarist owes so much, and who, though blind,
through the aid of his devoted wife and intelligent servant, Frances
Burnens, developed so many interesting facts, demonstrated the fact of
the queen's maternity. This author's work, second edition, published in
Edinburgh, in 1808, gives a full history of his wonderful observations
and experiments, and must ever rank with Langstroth as a classic,
worthy of study by all.
[Illustration: Fig. 14.
_Queen Bee, magnified._]
The queen, then, is the mother bee, in other words, a fully developed
female. Her ovaries (Fig. 11, _a, a_) are very large, nearly filling
her long abdomen. The tubes already described as composing them are
very numerous, while the spermatheca (Fig. 11, _e_) is plainly visible.
This is muscular, receives abundant nerves, and thus, without doubt,
may or may not be compressed to force the sperm cells in contact
with the eggs as they pass by the duet. Leuckart estimates that the
spermatheca will hold more than 25,000,000 spermatozoa.
The possession of the ovaries and attendant organs, is the chief
structural peculiarity which marks the queen, as these are the
characteristic marks of females among all animals. But she has other
peculiarities worthy of mention She is longer than either drones or
workers, being more than seven-eighths of an inch in length, and,
with her long tapering abdomen, is not without real grace and beauty.
The queen's mouth organs, too, are developed to a less degree than
are those of the worker-bees. Her jaws (Fig. 21, _b_) or mandibles
are weaker, with a rudimentary tooth, and her tongue or ligula (Fig.
15, _a_), as also the labial palpi (Fig. 15, _b_) and maxillæ are
considerably shorter. Her eyes, like the same in the worker-bee (Fig.
5), are smaller than those of the drones, and do not meet above. So the
three ocelli are situated above and between. The queen's wings, too,
(Fig. 14) are relatively shorter than those either of the workers or
drones, for instead of attaining to the end of the body, they reach but
little beyond the third joint of the abdomen. The queen, though she has
the characteristic posterior tibia and basal tarsus (Fig. 16, _p_), in
respect to breadth, has not the cavity and surrounding hairs, which
form the pollen baskets of the workers.
[Illustration: Fig. 15.
_Labium of Queen._
_a_--Ligula. _b_--Labial palpi.
_d, d_--Paraglossæ.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account