Marie Antoinette and the Downfall of RoyaltyImbert de Saint-Amand
History
Marie Antoinette and the Downfall of Royalty
Imbert de Saint-Amand
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Marie Antoinette, Queen, consort of Louis XVI, King of France, 1755-1793
As if to push the wretched monarch to extremities, the National
Assembly passed two decrees which struck him to the heart. According
to the first of {150} these, voted May 19, any ecclesiastic having
refused the oath to the civil constitution of the clergy, could be
transported at the simple request of twenty citizens of the canton in
which he resided. According to the second, voted June 8, a camp of
twenty thousand federates, recruited from every canton of the realm,
were to be assembled before Paris, in order, as was said in one of the
preambles, "to take every hope from the enemies of the common weal who
are scheming in the interior."
They had counted too much on the King's patience. He could not resolve
to sanction the two decrees, and banish the ecclesiastics whose
behavior he honored. Dumouriez afflicted him still further, when, in
entreating him to yield, he asked why he had sanctioned, at the close
of 1790, the decree obliging the clergy to take oath to the civil
constitution of the clergy. "Sire," said he, "you sanctioned the
decree for the priests' oath, and it is to that your veto must be
applied. If I had been one of your counsellors at the time, I would,
at the risk of my life, have advised you to refuse your sanction. Now
my opinion is that having, as I dare to say, committed the fault of
approving this decree, which has produced enormous evils, your veto, if
you apply it to the second decree, which may arrest the deluge of blood
ready to flow, will burden your conscience with all the crimes to which
the people are tending." Never had a sovereign's conscience been a
prey to similar perplexities. Louis XVI. seemed crushed beneath an
irresistible {151} fatality. The Tuileries, haunted night and day by
the spectre of Charles I., assumed a dismal air. At this period a sort
of stupor characterized the countenance, the gait, and even the silence
of the future victim of January 21. He no longer spoke; one might say
he no longer thought. He seemed prostrated, petrified.
A rumor got about that he had become almost imbecile through care and
trouble, so much so that he did not recognize his son, but on seeing
him approach, had asked: "What child is that?" It was added that while
out walking he caught sight of the steeple of Saint Denis from the top
of the hill, and cried out: "That is where I shall be on my birthday."
He had been so calumniated, so misunderstood, so outraged, that not
merely his crown but his existence had become an intolerable burden to
him. His throne and his life alike disgusted him. He was no longer a
King, but only the ghost of one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account