As some misrepresentation has been made on this subject through
misapprehension of the writer’s observations on Venus and Mercury, it
may be well to state that the tenuous markings on both these other
planets entirely lack the unnatural regularity distinguishing the
canals of Mars. The Venusian lines are hazy, ill-defined, and
non-uniform; the Mercurian broken and irregular, suggesting cracks.
Neither resemble the Martian in marvelous precision, and have never
been called canals by the writer nor by Schiaparelli, but solely by
those who have not seen them and have misapprehended their character
and look.
CHAPTER XVI
THEIR SYSTEM
Much more stands beyond. For, outdoing in suggestiveness the individual
traits of the lines, is the relation shown by them to one another. It
is the communal characteristics of the phenomenon that are most
surprising.
The individual peculiarities of the lines impress themselves at once;
the communal, only as the result of experience, collation, and thought.
As the observer becomes trained, the more lines he is able to make out,
until they fairly seam the whole surface of the light areas of the
planet. Their name collectively is legion; while to name them
individually is fast getting, for the number detected, to be
impossible. As with the increasing family of asteroids, figures alone
will prove adequate to the task.
Interdependence, not independence, marks the attitude of the canals.
Each not only proceeds with absolute directness from one point to
another, but at its terminals it meets canals which have come there
with like forthrightness from other far places upon the planet. Nor is
it two only that thus come together at a common junction. Three, four,
five,—up to as many as fourteen,—thus make rendezvous, and it is a
poor junction that cannot show at least six or seven. The result is a
network which triangulates the surface of the planet like a geodetic
survey into polygons of all shapes and sizes, the Arian areolas. The
size of the pieces forming this tesselate ground depends solely upon
the fineness of the definition. With every increase in the power of
seeing, each areola is cut into still smaller portions, usually by
connection between its corners. Thus a polygon or rhombus is split into
triangles which may themselves be divided in like manner, the mosaic
breaking into bits, the sides of which, however, always remain
clean-cut.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account