1900-1
Phison Dis S.
Euphrates Boreas
Hiddekel Cerberus S.
Amenthes Jamuna
Cerberus N. Pyramus
Cyclops Laestrygon
Ganges
28. Deuteronilus
Sitacus
Adamas
29. Djihoun
Gihon
30. Is
1903
Djihoun Typhon
Hiddekel Orontes
Phison
Euphrates
31. Protonilus
Gihon
32. Marsias
Amenthes
Laestrygon
Cyclops
Gigas
*Nilokeras I and II
Ganges
Deuteronilus
33. Pierius
34. Callirrhoe
Jamuna
Sitacus
35. Astaboras S.
36. Nar
37. Chaos
38. Aethiops
39. Hyblaeus
40. Eunostos
41. Thoth
42. Nepenthes
43. Triton
44. Pyramus
45. Fretum Anian
46. Vexillum
Lethes
Cerberus S.
47. Nilokeras I
Cerberus N.
48. Tithonius
1905
Nilokeras Ganges
Hiddekel Chrysorrhoas
Djihoun
Sitacus
Phison
Euphrates
Amenthes
Vexillum
Astaboras S.
Adamas
Cyclops
Cerberus S.
Cerberus N.
Tartarus
49. [*]Propontis
Gigas
Gihon
Nepenthes
Thoth
Laestrygon
50. Polyphemus
Deuteronilus
Triton
Eunostos
Tithonius
Callirrhoe
Pyramus
Nar
Protonilus
51. Naarmalcha
In spite of possessing the property of pairing, a canal may not always
exhibit it. To the production of the phenomenon the proper time is as
essential as the property itself. So far as a primary scanning or first
approximation is capable of revealing, a canal will be single at one
Martian season and double at another. Thus these canals alternated in
their state to Schiaparelli and for the earlier of his own observed
oppositions to the writer. In consequence Schiaparelli deemed
gemination a process which the canal periodically underwent. Three
stages in the development were to him distinguishable: the single
aspect, a short confused aspect, and the clearly dual one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account