largely responsible for assurance of the permanency of the dual state.
Perplexing exceptions, however, remain, so that it is possible at
present only to predicate the principal of most of the double canals
but not of all. Leaving the exceptions out of account for the moment,
we pass to those general characteristics which are intimately linked
with what has just been said.
Inasmuch as the act of getting into a state antedates the fact of being
there, it is logical to let the description of the first precede. An
account of the process of gemination may thus suitably come before that
of its result.
Flux, affecting the double canals in whole or part, is the cause of the
apparent gemination. According as the flux is partitive or total is a
single or a dual state produced. At the depth of its inconspicuousness
the canal may cease to be visible at all; this occurs when both lines
fade out. On the other hand, the one line may outfade the other, and we
are presented with a seemingly single canal, at this its minimum
showing. In such seasons of debility the one line may appear and the
other not, or occasionally the other show and the one not, according to
the air waves of the moment. It is at these times that the double
simulates a single canal, and unless well seen and carefully watched
might easily masquerade successfully as such. The Hiddekel in the depth
of its dead season is peculiarly given to this alternately partitive
presentation. As the flux comes on, one or both lines feel it. If one
only we are likely to have a confused canal; if both, a difficult
double. The strength of the lines increases until at last both attain
their maximum, and the canal stands revealed an unmistakable pair, the
two lines paralleling one another in appearance as in position.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account