Two general classes may be distinguished; those up to about five
degrees in width apart and those above this figure. Whether such very
widely separated lines as go to make up the second class, such as the
Nilokeras I and II, constitutes a double is a debatable point.
Schiaparelli thought they did, and so classed them. To me it did not at
first occur so to consider them, and in some instances, such as the
Helicon I and II, later observations seem to justify the omission. With
the Nilokeras I and II the outcome seems the other way. The reasons for
distrust of a physical relation between the constituents is not so much
the distance separating them, nor any lack of parallelism, as the
self-sufficient manner in which they show alone. Even this, however,
tends to be recognized in the narrower pairs as they come to be better
seen. It may be that width alone is wholly competent to selective
showing. For the farther apart two lines are on the planet, the more
opportunity is afforded the air waves to disclose the one without the
other, a relative revelation which is constantly happening to detail in
different parts of the disk. As long as any doubt exists of a physical
community of interest, it seems best to distinguish such possibly
merely parallel canals by suffixed numerals.
Of this class of doubles is the Nilokeras I and II. So wide is it that
Mr. Lampland succeeded in photographing it as such, the two
constituents showing well separated, and if it prove a true double it
will be the first Martian double to leave its impress on a sensitive
plate. Although separated by four hundred miles of territory, the two
lines are parallel so far as observation can detect, which, of course,
is not so very easy with the lines so far apart. In the country between
one crosswise canal certainly lies, the Phryxus, and much shading thus
far unaccounted for. Recent discoveries, however, point to the cause of
such shading as lines imperfectly seen. For in some cases the lines
have actually disclosed themselves, and warrant us in believing that it
is only imperfect seeing that keeps the others hid. Of the pair the
Nilokeras I is itself double, curiously reproducing what sometimes is
seen in the case of double stars, one of whose components turns out to
be itself a binary. The second line of the Nilokeras I lies close to
its primary on the north, and was on the only occasion of its detection
the merest of gossamers, while the Nilokeras I itself stood out strong
and dark. Thus do these Martian details increase and multiply in
intricacy the better the seeing brings them out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account