As the two planets, Mars and the Earth, turn on their axes the parts of
their surfaces they present to each other are constantly changing. For
a feature on Mars to be visible from a given post on earth, observer
and observed must confront each other, and, furthermore, it must be day
there when it is night here. But, as Mars takes about forty minutes
longer to turn than the Earth, such confronting occurs later and later
each night by about forty minutes, until finally it does not occur at
all while Mars is suitably above the horizon; then the feature passes
from sight to remain hidden till the difference of the rotations brings
it round into view again. There are thus times when a given region is
visible, times when it is not, and these succeed each other in from
five to six weeks, and are called presentations. For about a fortnight
at each presentation a region is centrally enough placed to be well
seen; for the rest of the period either ill-placed or on the other side
of the planet.
If a marking were always salient enough it would appear in every
drawing made of the disk during the recurrent fortnights of its
display. If it were weaker than this, it might appear on some drawings
and not on others, dependent upon its own strength and upon the
definition at the moment, and we should have a certain percentage of
visibility for it at that presentation. While if it changed in strength
between one presentation and the next, the percentage of its recording
would change likewise. Definition of course is always varying, but if
its value be noted at the time of each drawing this factor may be
allowed for more or less successfully. Making such allowance, together
with other corrections to produce extrinsic equality, such as the
planet’s distance, which we need not enter upon here, we are left with
only the marking’s intrinsic visibility to affect the percentages; that
is, the percentages tell of the changes it has successively undergone
and give us a history of its wax and wane.
From drawings accurately made it is possible to add to the accuracy of
the percentage by noting in each, not only the presence or absence of
the marking, but the degree of strength with which it is represented.
This was done on the final investigation in the present case, and it
was interesting to note how little difference it made in the result.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account