At the very start of observations its longitude chanced to be nearly
central and it was made out; but so far off was the planet that only
its northern part could be detected, because, as afterward appeared,
this part was the stronger, the canal being decidedly inconspicuous,
whereas other canals, the northern and even the Pallene and the Dis,
were strongly marked. At the next presentation the planet was nearer,
and details previously hidden for the distance now came out. Among them
was the Brontes, which, showing better than in January, could be traced
all the way to the Sinus Titanum. A drawing (I) made on February 25 and
reproduced in the text shows its appearance at the time. Its emergence
under neared conditions only served to accentuate its relative
inconspicuousness, for it showed now notably inferior to the northern
canals, and this not only in the matter of general visibility, but in
the character it displayed. It was a line of hazy definition,
contrasting thus with the sharp dark forms of its northern neighbors.
[Illustration: II. March 30.]
[Illustration: III. April 3.]
As the planet steadily approached the earth, and the canals to the
north became better and better seen, the Brontes instead of sharing in
the general improvement did exactly the opposite. It grew less visible
when it should have grown more so, if distance had been the cause of
its appearance. It was now only to be seen at the north, even when it
was seen at all; a state of things exemplified in Drawings II and III.
[Illustration: IV. May 4.]
As the planet now went away and detail should have dimmed, the Brontes
proceeded to do the opposite. One had almost said it was actuated by a
spirit of contrariety. For now when it had reason to grow faint it grew
in conspicuousness; just as, before, when it should have become
evident, it had declined. Distinctly farther off and smaller as the
planet was at the next presentation, the Brontes had clearly developed
both in tone and in the amount of it visible. This was in May (Drawings
IV and V). In June bad seeing prevented good observations, but in July,
Drawing VI, when the region again came round, the Brontes, in spite of
the then greatly increased distance, asserted itself so strongly that
even in not very good seeing its presence could not be passed by.
[Illustration: V. May 7.]
This contrariety of behavior had about it one very telling feature.
That the canal waxed or waned in exact opposition to distance and even
toward the last to seeing too, showed conclusively that neither
distance nor definition could in any way be held responsible for its
metamorphoses. A very fortunate circumstance, this of the observations,
for it directly eliminated size of disk, phase, and seeing, for which
correction are none too easy to make, and which in the minds of the
sceptical could always remain as unexplained possibilities of error.
[Illustration: VI. July 18.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account