That they are thus ancillary as well as coexistent today leads us to
confront for them a community of origin in the past; and further study
confirms the inference. Both paleontology and entomology, or the
science of the aged and the science of the young, prove such ancestry
to be a fact. By going back from the present into the past, or, what
amounts to substantially the same thing, by descending in the scale of
life to the lowest known forms of organism, we find proof of
concomitance, cogent because congenital. At the time when inorganic
chemical compounds first passed by evolution into organic ones, the
change was of so general a character that even such tardy
representatives of it as survive today tax erudition to tell to which
of the two great kingdoms they belong, the vegetal or the animal.
Simplest and most primitive of known organisms are the chromacea,
unnucleated single cells as Haeckel has shown, and next to them in
order come many of the bacteria, also of simple unnucleated plasm. So
little do the majority of the bacteria differ morphologically from the
chromacea, that on the score of structure the two are not to be
catalogued apart. Both are as elemental as anything well can be, which
only their diet serves to divide. Each is an organism without organs,
thus belying the dictionary definition of both animals and plants.
Etymologically they are not organic yet manifestly are alive, and only
in their action are unlike. The chromacea are plasm-forming beings, and
therefore they are plants; the bacteria are plasm-eating beings, and so
are animals. Even this distinction is not always preserved. As Haeckel
tells us: “the nitro-bacteria which dwell in the earth having the
vegetal property of converting ammonia by oxidation into nitrous acid
and this into nitric acid, using as their source of carbon the carbonic
acid gas of the atmosphere. They feed, like the chromacea, on simple
inorganic compounds.” Here, then, we have, close to the threshold of
organic life, unorganized organisms, roughly speaking coeval and
differing in a sense but little, either of them, from inorganic
crystals; and yet the one is an animal, the other a plant. Progenitors
of the two great divisions of life, they were themselves concomitantly
evolved, either side by side or as offshoots both of a common stock.
Now, if the ancestors of the two great organic kingdoms were thus
simultaneously produced here, we are warranted in believing that they
would similarly be produced elsewhere, given conditions suitably alike.
In consequence, if we detect the presence of the one, we already have
an argument for inferring the other. Not to complete our syllogism
would be to flaunt a lack of logic in nature’s face.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account