For many years afterward I was pursued by this unlucky speech, or
rather by the misinterpretation given to it alike by friend and foe.
Nast’s first cartoon was accepted as a faithful portrait, and I was
accordingly satirized and stigmatized, though no thought of violence
ever had entered my mind, and in the final proceedings I had voted for
the Electoral Commission Bill and faithfully stood by its decisions.
Joseph Pulitzer, who immediately followed me on the occasion named,
declared that he wanted my “one hundred thousand” to come fully armed
and ready for business; yet he never was taken to task or reminded of
his temerity.
IX
The Electoral Commission Bill was considered with great secrecy by the
joint committees of the House and Senate. Its terms were in direct
contravention of Mr. Tilden’s plan. This was simplicity itself. He was
for asserting by formal resolution the conclusive right of the two
Houses acting concurrently to count the electoral vote and determine
what should be counted as electoral votes; and for denying, also by
formal resolution, the pretension set up by the Republicans that the
President of the Senate had lawful right to assume that function. He
was for urging that issue in debate in both Houses and before the
country. He thought that if the attempt should be made to usurp for the
president of the Senate a power to make the count, and thus practically
to control the Presidential election, the scheme would break down in
process of execution.
Strange to say, Mr. Tilden was not consulted by the party leaders in
Congress until the fourteenth of January, and then only by Mr. Hewitt,
the extra constitutional features of the electoral-tribunal measure
having already received the assent of Mr. Bayard and Mr. Thurman, the
Democratic members of the Senate committee.
Standing by his original plan and answering Mr. Hewitt’s statement that
Mr. Bayard and Mr. Thurman were fully committed, Mr. Tilden said: “Is
it not, then, rather late to consult me?”
To which Mr. Hewitt replied: “They do not consult you. They are public
men, and have their own duties and responsibilities. I consult you.”
In the course of the discussion with Mr. Hewitt which followed Mr.
Tilden said: “If you go into conference with your adversary, and can’t
break off because you feel you must agree to something, you cannot
negotiate—you are not fit to negotiate. You will be beaten upon every
detail.”
Replying to the apprehension of a collision of force between the
parties Mr. Tilden thought it exaggerated, but said: “Why surrender
now? You can always surrender. Why surrender before the battle for fear
you may have to surrender after the battle?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account