The day wore on and the latent opposition seemed to increase. I had
been named chairman of the committee and had at a single sitting that
morning written a completed platform. Each plank of this was severally
and closely scrutinized. It was well into the afternoon before we
reached the plank I chiefly cared about. When I read this the storm
broke. Half the committee rose against it. At the close, with more heat
than was either courteous or tactful, I said: “Gentlemen, I wish to do
no more than bid farewell to a leader who four years ago took the
Democratic party at its lowest fortunes and made it a power again. He
is well on his way to the grave. I would place a wreath of flowers on
that grave. I ask only this of you. Refuse me, and by God, I will go to
that mob yonder and, dead or alive, nominate him, and you will be
powerless to prevent!”
Mr. Barksdale, of Mississippi, a suave gentleman, who had led the
dissenters, said, “We do not refuse you. But you say that we ‘regret’
Mr. Tilden’s withdrawal. Now I do not regret it, nor do those who agree
with me. Could you not substitute some other expression?”
“I don’t stand on words,” I answered. “What would you suggest?”
Mr. Barksdale said: “Would not the words ‘We have received with the
deepest sensibility Mr. Tilden’s letter of withdrawal,’ answer your
purpose?”
“Certainly,” said I, and the plank in the platform, as it was amended,
was adopted unanimously.
Mr. Tilden did not die. He outlived all his immediate rivals. Four
years later, in 1884, his party stood ready again to put him at its
head. In nominating Mr. Cleveland it thought it was accepting his
dictation reënforced by the enormous majority—nearly 200,000—by which
Mr. Cleveland, as candidate for Governor, had carried New York in the
preceding State election. Yet, when the votes in the presidential
election came to be counted, he carried it, if indeed he carried it at
all, by less than 1,100 majority, the result hanging in the balance for
nearly a week.
II
In the convention of 1884, which met at Chicago, we had a veritable
monkey-and-parrot time. It was next after the schism in Congress
between the Democratic factions led respectively by Carlisle and
Randall, Carlisle having been chosen Speaker of the House over Randall.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account