There was a party of reaction in Kentucky, claiming to be Democratic,
playing to the lead of the party of repression at the North. It refused
to admit that the head of the South was in the lion’s mouth and that
the first essential was to get it out. The Courier-Journal proposed to
stroke the mane, not twist the tail of the lion. Thus it stood between
two fires. There arose a not unnatural distrust of the journalistic
monopoly created by the consolidation of the three former dailies into
a single newspaper, carrying an unfamiliar hyphenated headline.
Touching its policy of sectional conciliation it picked its way
perilously through the cross currents of public opinion. There was
scarcely a sinister purpose that was not alleged against it by its
enemies; scarcely a hostile device that was not undertaken to put it
down and drive it out.
Its constituency represented an unknown quantity. In any event it had
to be created. Meanwhile, it must rely upon its own resources,
sustained by the courage of the venture, by the integrity of its
convictions and aims, and by faith in the future of the city, the state
and the country.
Still, to be precise, it was the morning of Sunday, November 8,1868.
The night before the good people of Louisville had gone to bed
expecting nothing unusual to happen. They awoke to encounter an
uninvited guest arrived a little before the dawn. No hint of its coming
had got abroad; and thus the surprise was the greater. Truth to say, it
was not a pleased surprise, because, as it flared before the eye of the
startled citizen in big Gothic letters, The Courier-Journal, there
issued thence an aggressive self-confidence which affronted the _amour
propre_ of the sleepy villagers. They were used to a very different
style of newspaper approach.
Nor was the absence of a timorous demeanor its only offense. The
Courier had its partisans, the Journal and the Democrat had their
friends. The trio stood as ancient landmarks, as recognized and
familiar institutions. Here was a double-headed monster which, without
saying “by your leave” or “blast your eyes” or any other politeness,
had taken possession of each man’s doorstep, looking very like it had
brought its knitting and was come to stay.
The Journal established by Mr. Prentice, the Courier by Mr. Haldeman
and the Democrat by Mr. Harney, had been according to the standards of
those days successful newspapers. But the War of Sections had made many
changes. At its close new conditions appeared on every side. A
revolution had come into the business and the spirit of American
journalism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account