Life is an adventure and all of us adventurers—saving that the word
presses somewhat harder upon the woman than the man—most things do in
fact, whereby she is given greater endurance—leaving to men the duty of
caring for the women; and, if need be, looking death squarely and
defiantly in the face.
The world often puts the artificial before the actual; but under the
dispensation of the Christian civilization—derived from the Hebraic—the
family requiring a head, headship is assigned to the male. This male is
commonly not much to speak of for beauty of form or decency of
behavior. He is made purposely tough for work and fight. He gets
toughened by outer contact. But back of all are the women, the children
and the home.
I have been fighting the woman’s battle for equality in the things that
count, all my life. I would despise myself if I had not been. In
contesting precipitate universal suffrage for women, I conceived that I
was still fighting the woman’s battle.
We can escape none of Nature’s laws. But we need not handicap ourselves
with artificial laws. At best, life is an experiment, Death the final
adventure. Feminism seems to me its next of kin; still we may not call
the woman who assails the soap boxes—even those that antic about the
White House gates—by the opprobrious terms of adventuress. Where such a
one is not a lunatic she is a nuisance. There are women and women.
We may leave out of account the shady ladies of history. Neither
Aspasia nor Lucrezia Borgia nor the Marquise de Brinvilliers could with
accuracy be called an adventuress. The term is of later date. Its
origin and growth have arisen out of the complexities of modern
society.
In fiction Milady and Madame Marneffe come in for first honors—in each
the leopard crossed on the serpent and united under a petticoat,
beautiful and wicked—but since the Balzac and Dumas days the
story-tellers and stage-mongers have made exceeding free with the type,
and we have between Herman Merivale’s Stephanie de Mohrivart and
Victorien Sardou’s Zica a very theater—or shall we say a charnel
house—of the woman with the past; usually portrayed as the victim of
circumstance; unprincipled through cruel experience; insensible through
lack of conscience; sexless in soul, but a siren in seductive arts;
cold as ice; hard as iron; implacable as the grave, pursuing her ends
with force of will, intellectual audacity and elegance of manner, yet,
beneath this brilliant depravity, capable of self-pity, yielding anon
in moments of depression to a sudden gleam of human tenderness and a
certain regret for the innocence she has lost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account