That, of course, settled it. They held it up. But after the
presidential election it reached Arthur, and he did veto it. Not till
Cleveland came in did Porter obtain his restoration.
Curiously enough General Grant approved this. I had listened to the
debate in the House—especially the masterly speech of William Walter
Phelps—without attaining a clear understanding of the many points at
issue. I said as much to General Grant.
“Why,” he replied, “the case is as simple as A, B, C. Let me show you.”
Then, with a pencil he traced the Second Bull Run battlefield, the
location of troops, both Federal and Confederate, and the exact passage
in the action which had compromised General Porter.
“If Porter had done what he was ordered to do,” he went on, “Pope and
his army would have been annihilated. In point of fact Porter saved
Pope’s Army.” Then he paused and added: “I did not at the outset know
this. I was for a time of a different opinion and on the other side. It
was Longstreet’s testimony—which had not been before the first Court of
Inquiry that convicted Porter—which vindicated him and convinced me.”
Chapter the Tenth
Of Liars and Lying—Woman Suffrage and Feminism—The Professional
Female—Parties, Politics, and Politicians in America
I
All is fair in love and war, the saying hath it. “Lord!” cried the most
delightful of liars, “How this world is given to lying.” Yea, and how
exigency quickens invention and promotes deceit.
Just after the war of sections I was riding in a train with Samuel
Bowles, who took a great interest in things Southern. He had been
impressed by a newspaper known as The Chattanooga Rebel and, as I had
been its editor, put innumerable questions to me about it and its
affairs. Among these he asked how great had been its circulation.
Without explaining that often an entire company, in some cases an
entire regiment, subscribed for a few copies, or a single copy, I
answered: “I don’t know precisely, but somewhere near a hundred
thousand, I take it.” Then he said: “Where did you get your press
power?”
This was, of course, a poser, but it did not embarrass me in the least.
I was committed, and without a moment’s thought I proceeded with an
imaginary explanation which he afterward declared had been altogether
satisfying. The story was too good to keep—maybe conscience pricked—and
in a chummy talk later along I laughingly confessed.
“You should tell that in your dinner speech tonight,” he said. “If you
tell it as you have just told it to me, it will make a hit,” and I did.
I give it as the opinion of a long life of experience and observation
that the newspaper press, whatever its delinquencies, is not a common
liar, but the most habitual of truth tellers. It is growing on its
editorial page I fear a little vapid and colorless. But there is a
general and ever-present purpose to print the facts and give the public
the opportunity to reach its own conclusions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account