English essays; English literature -- 20th century; Short stories, English
L. T. I wish I could share your enthusiasm, or that I could change
places with you. Every year the personality of a new artist is revealed
to you. I know you only pretend not to admire the modern school of
painting. You find it a convenient pose. Your flora and your fauna are
always receiving additions; while my garden is withered; my zoo is out of
repair. The bars are broken; the tanks have run dry. There is hardly a
trace of life except in the snake-house, and, as I mentioned, the last
giraffe is dead.
L. C. Our friend, Dr. Chalmers Mitchell, is fortunately able to give us
a different account of the institution in Regent's Park. You are quite
wrong about modern painting. None of the younger men can paint at all. A
few of them can draw, I admit. It is all they can do. The death of
Charles Furse blasted all my hopes of English art. Whistler is dead;
Sargent is an American.
L. T. Well, so is Henry James, if it comes to that. And so _was_
Whistler. But I have seen the works of several young artists who I
understand are carrying out the great traditions of painting. Ricketts,
Shannon, Wilson Steer, Rothenstein, Orpen, Nicholson, Augustus John are
surely worthy successors to Turner, Alfred Stevens, and the
Pre-Raphaelites.
L. C. They are merely connoisseurs gifted with expressing their
appreciation of the past in paint. They appeal to you as a literary man.
You like to detect in every stroke of their brushes an echo of the past.
Their pictures have been _heard_, not _seen_. All the younger artists
are committing burglary on the old masters.
L. T. It is you who are a disappointed optimist.
L. C. Not about literature or the drama. I seem to hear, with Ibsen's
'Master Builder,' the younger generation knocking at the door.
L. T. It comes in without knocking in my experience; and generally has
_fig_-leaves in its hair--a decided advance on the coiffure of Hedda
Gabler's lover.
L. C. But look at Bernard Shaw.
L. T. Why should I look at Bernard Shaw? I read his plays and am more
than ever convinced that he has gone on the wrong lines. His was the
opportunity. He made _il gran refuto_. Some one said that George
Saintsbury never got over the first night of _Hernani_. Shaw never
recovered the _premiere_ of _Ghosts_. He roofed our Thespian temple with
Irish slate. His disciples found English drama solid brick and leave it
plaster of Paris. Yet Shaw might have been another Congreve.
L. C. _Troja fuit_. We do not want another. I am sure you never went
to the Court at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account