English essays; English literature -- 20th century; Short stories, English
THE STATUE. It was my intention this evening to make a few observations
on flogging in the Navy, Vaccination, the Censor, Vivisection, the Fabian
Society, the Royal Academy, Compound Chinese Labour, Style, Simple
Prohibition, Vulgar Fractions, and other kindred subjects. But as I
opened the paper this morning, my eye caught these headlines: 'Future of
the House of Lords,' 'Mr. Edmund Gosse at home,' 'The Nerves of Lord
Northcliffe,' 'Interview with Mr. Winston Churchill,' 'Reported
Indisposition of Miss Edna May.' A problem was thus presented to me.
Will I, shall I, ought I to speak to my friends _here_--ahem!--and
elsewhere, on the subject about which they came to hear me speak.
(_Applause_.) No. I said; the bounders must be disappointed; otherwise
they will know what to expect. You must always surprise your audience.
When it has been advertised (sufficiently) that I am going to speak about
the truth, for example, the audience comes here expecting me to speak
about fiction. The only way to surprise them is to speak the truth and
that I always do. Nothing surprises English people more than truth; they
don't like it; they don't pay any attention to those (such as my friend
Mr. H. G. Wells and myself) who _trade_ in truth; but they listen and go
away saying, 'How very whimsical and paradoxical it all is,' and 'What a
clever adventurer the fellow is, to be sure.' 'That was a good joke
about duty and beauty being the same thing'--that was a joke I did _not_
make. It is not my kind of joke--but when people begin ascribing to you
the jokes of other people, you become a living--I was going to say
statue--but I mean a living classic.
THE DEVIL. I thought you disliked anything classic?
THE STATUE. Ahem! only _dead_ classics--especially when they are
employed to protect romanticism. Dead classics are the protective
tariffs put on all realism and truth by bloated idealism. In a country
of plutocrats, idealism keeps out truth: idealism is more expensive, and
therefore more in demand. In America, there are more plutocrats, and
therefore more idealists . . . as Mr. Pember Reeves has pointed out in
New Zealand . . .
THE DEVIL. But I say, is this drama?
THE STATUE. Certainly not. It is a discussion taking place at a
theatre. It is no more drama than a music-hall entertainment, or a comic
opera, or a cinematograph, or a hospital operation, all of which things
take place in theatres. But surely it is more entertaining to come to a
discussion charmingly mounted by Ricketts--discussion too, in which every
one knows what he is going to say--than to flaccid plays in which the
audience always knows what the actors _are_ going to say better often
than the actors. The sort of balderdash which Mr. --- serves up to us
for plays.
THE DEVIL (_peevish and old-fashioned_). I wish you would define drama.
HANKIN (_advancing_). Won't you have tea, Commander? It's not bad tea.
THE STATUE. I was afraid you were going to talk idealism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account