Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight itHoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
History
Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight it
Hoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
Communism -- United States
Members may be disciplined for many reasons. One of the most serious is
being a _deviationist_, that is, differing from the Party line. This
charge has led to wholesale purges in the past, including the ousting of
such leaders as Lovestone, Gitlow, Browder, and literally hundreds of
lesser members.
The Party claims to be an “advanced” element, teaching the noncommunist
masses the “glories” of socialism. As leaders, communists must be “in
front” of the less informed yet not too far ahead to be out of sight.
Just where to be at any given time is decided by the Party inner clique.
Anyone disagreeing is a deviationist, guilty of either _left-wing
sectarianism_ or _right-wing opportunism_.
Some individuals, the communists say, may stray too far to the left. They
want the Party to be more militant, to hurry up the revolution. They rush
on ahead, forgetting to guide the noncommunists. That’s wrong, says the
Party. Such an attitude would isolate the Party, make it an ineffectual
sect. These individuals are guilty of left-wing sectarianism. They must
turn around and come back.
On the other hand, many members lag behind the correct position. They
disregard the Party’s role as an “advanced teacher” and allow it to work
too closely with capitalism. They are right-wing opportunists, equally as
guilty as left-wing sectarians. They had better rid themselves of this
“capitalist complex” and catch up.
These terms sound massive. To communists, however, they are everyday
expressions. Time after time in Party meetings the charge will be
heard, “He’s an opportunist,” or, “He’s a left-wing sectarian.” To the
communists that’s like calling a man a thief or coward.
You can well imagine how these “errors” are corrected. Disciplinary
scythes can cut down anyone disliked by the leadership. If you want
to get rid of a comrade, accuse him of left-wing sectarianism or
right-wing opportunism. He’ll probably then be hauled into Party “court.”
Disciplinary vogues sweep the Party: for a while, left-wing sectarianism
becomes popular, then right-wing opportunism. After Browder’s removal in
1945 as a right-wing opportunist (also called _revisionist_), the style
was to criticize opportunism. Since the Geneva Conference of 1955 the
fashion has been to attack left-wing sectarianism.
Another serious error is _chauvinism_, applied to a member who supposedly
thinks himself superior to others.
Any member can bring charges, no matter how silly, trivial, and stupid.
That’s a communist technique: always keep members in fear. Never must a
comrade become secure, complacent, or unconcerned. He must constantly
be worrying about “what’s coming next.” This prevents the entrenchment
of Party bureaucrats and the formation of cliques; it makes discipline
easier to impose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account