Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight itHoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
History
Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight it
Hoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
Communism -- United States
—a veterans’ meeting endorses “peace.”
—a nationality festival passes a resolution for “peace.”
—a youth affair favors “peace.”
—a neighborhood group comes out for “peace.”
—a women’s rally fights for “peace.”
Whatever its composition, the group, once under communist control, is
switched to the Party line. The feigned interest in legitimate demands is
merely a trap.
Even holidays are used to enhance the Party’s aims. For example, the
_Daily Worker_ once headlined a story “Mother’s Day to Be Marked by Peace
Tables....” Postcards should be distributed on Mother’s Day, the story
continued, “declaring the deepest need of all American mothers to be a
ban on A- and H-bombs....”
Also planned, according to the story, were special Mother’s Day leaflets
and placards as well as balloons for the children reading “World-Wide Ban
of A- and H-bombs.”
Many people sincerely believe, for many reasons, that these bombs should
be banned. However, to communists, the true meaning of peace and banning
the A- and H-bombs is weakening the United States and advancing Russian
aggressive aims.
And so it goes. A discussion may start about the low price of oats,
better working conditions on the second shift, equal pay for women,
the death rate among Eskimos, but it will end with the endorsement of
“peace”; “amnesty for the Smith Act victims”; “repeal of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 and the McCarran-Walter Immigration and Nationality
Act.”
Scattered, variegated, and inarticulate interests, under Party guidance,
are brought into a common denominator: support for the Party line.
The Party line, in fact, is the sum total of all Party demands at any
given time. You must learn to see it as a whole. Some demands are always
present and seem innocent enough, such as those for higher wages, lower
taxes, and better housing. But, remember, communists don’t really care
about genuine social reforms. These immediate demands are strictly for
agitational purposes. They serve to arouse people and to cause tension.
William Z. Foster says very candidly: “Our Party is a revolutionary
Party. It aims not simply to ease conditions a bit under capitalism for
the workers but to abolish capitalism altogether.”
If ever achieved, these demands will be restated in more extreme form.
Other demands in the Party line are short-term; that is, they may quickly
change, depending on the current national and international situation.
Consider the Party’s stand that Formosa should be returned to China
proper. Suppose the present communist regime in China were overthrown and
a government hostile to Soviet Russia gained power. This demand would be
quickly abandoned. On the other hand, certain demands never change, such
as support of the Soviet Union.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account