Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight itHoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
History
Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight it
Hoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
Communism -- United States
The problem for communist headquarters was how best to attack. The
obvious target, as in most organizations, was the officers. To control
one officer, such as a president, secretary, or treasurer, is often
worth ten, twenty, or fifty rank-and-file members. Everything must be
done to prepare for the next elections in an effort to oust as many
anticommunists as possible and replace them with pro-Party people or at
least neutrals.
All officers of The 123 Group were bitterly anticommunist except one, the
secretary. He would have loudly protested if called a Party member, and
he wasn’t; but for many years he had maintained cordial contacts with
Party officials. He was, in every respect, a sympathizer. He was popular
and had a large personal following among the rank and file. For this
reason the anticommunists had not been able to defeat him. Here was the
obvious weak point.
“We’ve got to draw up an entire slate of candidates,” the Party organizer
emphasized. “Let’s call it the ‘Reform Ticket.’ We must include a few
reactionaries. That’ll hide our interest.” Then the frank admission: “We
must not show our hand. We’ll run on a program acceptable to the right
wing as much as possible. After we get in we’ll take control.”
The communist Trojan horse was jockeying for position. Maneuver often
compensates for lack of numbers and organizational position. Deals,
stratagems, and hypocrisy must be given free play.
The secretary-sympathizer agreed to run on the Reform Ticket. His name
would lend prestige and give the ticket a capable career officer. Here
was the first breakthrough. More deals, however, were necessary.
The chief problem now was the presidency. Whom to run? A known
procommunist could not win. To support another anticommunist was
unthinkable. The answer: an opportunist.
The right man was at hand, a noncommunist, personally ambitious, who
disliked the current president. Lacking a dynamic personality, a “little
backward,” as one Party official called him, he could be “guided.” He was
just the man to head the ticket.
He was contacted. Run for president and you’ll receive “our” support.
The communists, of course, didn’t openly identify themselves. The
opportunist, however, probably suspected, but he didn’t care. That is
the mark of an opportunist: his personal ambition is so great that it
overrides every other consideration.
Now the other noncommunist candidates on the Reform Ticket must be chosen.
To communists there are different degrees of “foes.” A “60 per cent” foe
is better “working material” than a “100 per cent” foe. Another may be
appraised as a 40 or even 10 percenter. In drawing up the slate, find as
many “low percenters” as possible. Also there is the practical factor,
always to be remembered, of selecting candidates who can “pull” votes to
the ticket.
These deals were made.
Then there was the task, after selection of the slate (which contained
concealed communists along with noncommunists), of getting it elected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account