Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight itHoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
History
Masters of deceit : $b The story of Communism in America and how to fight it
Hoover, J. Edgar (John Edgar)
Communism -- United States
To Barbara Hartle’s lasting credit, she did not try to evade
responsibilities for her past errors. The information that she furnished
the FBI is now at work against the very Party that for almost twenty
years duped her. And she, with a clear conscience, is winning back the
respect and esteem she had before the Party stole her away. She deserves
aid as she reconstructs her life.
Many interviews with Party members reflect numerous men and women inside
the movement today in various stages of disillusionment. Such doubts are
good omens. They indicate that not all members are lost beyond recall. By
the very nature of Party discipline doubts are inevitable. Any member in
the Party today without doubts is indeed a complete slave.
What causes doubt to arise in the minds of members? Our experiences
reveal these major categories:
1. _The absence of freedom inside the Party._ The greatest single factor
making for doubt is the lack of democracy inside the Party. “I was
constantly whipped into line,” one member said, “on policies and issues
with which I disagreed.” “Discussions at meetings were not open....”
Party organizers would come and tell the club what to do. “Why Writer
Quit Reds: They Frown on Thinking,” read a headline in a New York City
newspaper. This member could no longer force himself “to live in the
stifling atmosphere of the party line with all its ruthless intolerance
for the processes of the mind.” In another instance a woman told us how
she had voted “no” in a Party meeting. “People literally moved their
chairs away from me. I walked out of the meeting and never attended a
Communist Party meeting again.”
More and more intellectuals are realizing that the Party is simply
exploiting their prestige and talents, without trusting them.
Intellectuals are encouraged to think, if they think the “right” way;
but any independent thinking is not allowed. That is why, in the
final analysis, the Party keeps the pressure on its members who are
intellectuals. It fears that they might start thinking for themselves. As
one intellectual stated, “I think that the Party was using me, as they
were many other intellectuals.... I always had the feeling that they
never trusted intellectuals beyond a certain limit....”
2. _The inability to live a normal life._ Closely allied is the
impossibility of living as a decent human being. One member said he
resented the Party’s constantly demanding his time. There was no end
of assignments: distributing literature, attending meetings, getting
petitions signed. Another member complained that she was “sick and tired”
of her husband’s putting the Party before her and the children. The
Party’s instructions must always take precedence. This constant stealing
of time, never allowing the member to relax, develop a hobby, or enjoy a
family, provokes the most searching doubts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account