Matisse Picasso and Gertrude Stein: With Two Shorter StoriesStein, Gertrude
General
Matisse Picasso and Gertrude Stein: With Two Shorter Stories
Stein, Gertrude
Experimental fiction, American
They did not see the same when they were not lame and they never were
lame and they sent away some of the children. They did not mean that the
other place was not farther. They did think that they saw which was not
too much wetter. They liked a piece of the middle of the morning. They
did not stop often in the afternoon. They did not use any evening. They
were not alone. They went away. They did not forget the pieces of
furniture.
The labor of losing what there was not any soporific in adopting was not
agonising. There had not come to be division. There was that article.
They saw that away. It was not a comfort. They had that to keep the
place away. They were not blameworthy. They had the old season.
They did not anticipate lightly. They had the medium which was the
medium of having gone to see something where it was raining. They did
not tell the same then when they had that energy. They were not
progressive.
A dark day is a day when the light is away and the light has been lit
and the fire has not gone away and the day that has been a dark day is a
day when the flowers are gay and the color that is there is staying
there. That is a dark day.
Coming away is not staying away. That is not the way that he who came
away and lived there where he came away would come away when he came to
go away. He liked something. He said that that was not too much of a
home. He said that that was not the only meaning there is in telling
what he was telling. He was not denying something. He had that tender
expression. He accepted the hospitality that entailed eating what was
cooking and he ate what was cooking when he was walking. He did not
disturb the reason. He was not irregular.
The precious piece that had the hand that was not too nicely finished
was the thing he kept when he saw where it was. It was not very likely
that he remembered that it had been had. It was not certain that he was
not remembering borrowing something. He was not likely to say that he
had seen it most. He was certainly sure to have it then. He spoke of it.
That substance that had the slight weight that made it fall when it was
in the air was not the same as the thing he had when he did not give
back anything. He did what he should when he should do what he did. He
was reliable. He was the certain fashion of continuing when there was
not any question that he was not forgotten. He did not have that as a
thing to do. He was not escaping.
He had the certain pleasure of authentication and he was not the
monopoly of having everything. He was not parsimonious and he was not
omnipresent.
The ones who were and they said nothing were not saying the same. They
said something.
Kindly expecting that the things that would not be lasting would be
disappearing they did not disorganise exhibiting something. They were
continuous. They were not suffering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account