Matisse Picasso and Gertrude Stein: With Two Shorter StoriesStein, Gertrude
General
Matisse Picasso and Gertrude Stein: With Two Shorter Stories
Stein, Gertrude
Experimental fiction, American
The way of approaching remaining alternating between that realisation
and distinguishing receiving that distinction is the way to say that
some have the change of any three. That does not alter all feeling. That
does alter all that is altered and anything is alright if all that is
said is enough said and more is said. It is quite the best way to refuse
the certainty that the three are not only not all there but not
everywhere. They are each one the best part of being alone that is to
say when they are not accepting and refusing. They are always not quite
returning. They have each one that of their organisation. They can be
seen. That is not the only way to say something there is to say by any
one who is to say what there is to say of each one of them being any one
who is and having all of some which is recognition. This does not
outbalance that which is not denied. That does not make any agreement.
If there was more to do there would be more as there are not a few. Each
one has that entire system. Each one is not lonesome.
One is not one of three. There is no place for anything and any place
that is occupied is occupied. The demand that is made is not denying
that the whole place is not bigger and yet it is, of course it is, of
course the whole place is not bigger, when it is the whole place there
is no crisis and if there is a crisis is not there always the change of
place where the advantage is the same and the addition is not kept away.
Certainly all are when they are when there are enough to be not much
more than completely separated. Any one can talk of one.
There is the sound that has no reverberation and if enough are occupied
then surely they will change all of some of most of their minds. That
does not beat all instruction.
And so there are not there every day and this is not to say that there
are not always three. Always there are three, those three are three and
that does not make a number, there is not a number that is three.
One and one and one, there are none, that is to say they have not that
meaning. There are three that is to say they have not any such meaning,
they have not any meaning of being three, they do not do so.
Any use that there is in exclusion does not include two numbers. If any
one is mentioned, three are not mentioned. One is mentioned, three who
are mentioned are mentioned. That does not show meaning. They have not
any union. They do not come to separate. That is not something that has
come together. They are there, everywhere. That is the way to mean that.
If a cause that is not put there where the world is full when it is not
pressing is in that place there there is not any need for success. It
comes where it is when it is early. Anyway there can be a change in
time. All of the progress does not change the number. There are no
arrangements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account