Matisse Picasso and Gertrude Stein: With Two Shorter StoriesStein, Gertrude
General
Matisse Picasso and Gertrude Stein: With Two Shorter Stories
Stein, Gertrude
Experimental fiction, American
The time when was when there was an occasion for returning a conviction
with no more restlessness than always. That was that time. In that way
there was no proof of a condition. There was no proof of any more
gratification when there might have been. This was so serious and so
placed and no more occupation was aroused than that which was reported.
This means that there always is rest.
So then to begin again and again and again. To begin and begin and to
begin again.
To begin again means that there is nothing more timely than the use of
any single and double argument. This is very timely.
Surely there is no doubt and there can be none because there was the use
in that speech, there was said that the time which was spent was not for
rent that is to say it was sold. That did not mean that there was
selling, that did not mean anything. It was said. To be sure if there is
no occasion for more than the recital of that some do so and it was done
and no moisture was so wet and yet there is moisture when there is
water, there is moisture and water.
Occupation, argument and reason and more than that, the place of a whole
distance. All this does not make a passage of time or distance. It is
the same as the best.
The sign that makes the whole length so long and so light is not the
same in the distance and with a measure. It is enough and a sense for
travelling is not misplaced. It is macademised.
If there is a change, and there is no change, if there is a change and
the window is a window seat, and the wall is a window, and the summer is
long, and there is no wet winter, if there is a change, and there is no
change, if there is a change then what is the difference between more
and most, what is the difference and why is the difference not so simple
as that. The difference is as simple as the difference between what
there is and what there is. There is a difference and there is no time
in which there is no reception of anything. There is not any effect when
the effect is not produced. And if there is no change, if there is then
certainly the whole explanation is not suggested. Nothing is suggested
when there is no passing away and into and around and there is no such a
thing, there is not any denial.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account