Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor: (Stanhope Historical Essay 1901)Seton-Watson, R. W. (Robert William)
History
Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor: (Stanhope Historical Essay 1901)
Seton-Watson, R. W. (Robert William)
Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, 1459-1519
[137] See a most interesting article in the _Monthly Review_, February
1901, "An Emperor's Sporting Chronicle," by W. Baillie Grohman.
Perhaps even more extraordinary than these instances is the letter to
his daughter Margaret (Dec. 22, 1510). He desires her to make three
requests of Henry VIII.--first, for 2,000 archers for Maximilian's
expedition to Rome; second, for pardon for the Duke of Suffolk; and
_third_, for "deux beaux doghes femelles et ung masle," for the Duke of
Würtemberg--Le Glay, i., letter 269. Earlier in the same year
(February 1510), he expresses his delight at the eager way in which his
young grandson Charles is taking to the chase, and adds, "otherwise one
might deem him a bastard."
{115}
V
The wideness of Maximilian's interests, and the variety of spheres in
which those interests led him to take a part, enhance the difficulty of
estimating or defining his character as a whole, and each different
attitude demands discussion before any general conclusion can be drawn.
His political career, however, despite all its intrigues and
complications, is comparatively easy to estimate; for his persistence
in controlling his own policy and his dislike of associates and
confidants throw the entire responsibility of any given action upon the
Emperor's own shoulders. His retentive memory and tireless energy
aided him in what would otherwise have been a hopeless effort. "He
seldom or never," writes the Venetian ambassador in 1496, "discusses
with any one what he has in hand or does, especially in important
matters."[138] He was in the habit of dictating to his secretaries
late into the night, and often drew up important documents with his own
hands; while even during his meals, and in the midst of his hunting
expeditions, he dictated dispatches or gave instructions to his
councillors. For his credit as a politician this monopolizing spirit
was most unfortunate. His secrecy kept his councillors and ambassadors
ever in the dark, and rendered a firm attitude on their part almost
impossible. His over-confidence, both in his own capacity {116} and in
the honesty of others, received many a rude shock, and often made him
the dupe of his intellectual inferiors. Machiavelli tells us the
opinion of an intimate friend of the Emperor, "that anyone could cheat
him without his knowing it."[139] His condemnation as a bungler by the
Florentine statesman has been used as an argument in Maximilian's
favour; but the only possible inference is that in affairs of state the
Emperor's morals had not suffered so complete an eclipse as those of
his rivals, while his statecraft was based upon a neglect of sound
political principles. But even more prominent than the self-centred
nature of his policy are two fatal weaknesses in his character, which
account for most of his failures and disappointments--his want of
perseverance and his open-handedness. The whole history of his reign
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account