Measure Your Mind: The Mentimeter and How to Use ItTrabue, Marion Rex
Science
Measure Your Mind: The Mentimeter and How to Use It
Trabue, Marion Rex
Educational tests and measurements; Intelligence tests; Psychological tests
Scores from 0 to 8 indicate Inferior Ability
Scores from 9 to 12 indicate Low Average Ability
Scores from 13 to 22 indicate Average Ability
Scores from 23 to 26 indicate High Average Ability
Scores from 27 to 30 indicate Superior Ability
MENTIMETER NO. 8
DIGIT-SYMBOL SUBSTITUTION
_Character of the Test._
Ability to master a language is usually very closely related to general
intellectual ability along academic or abstract lines. The relationship
between the age at which a child begins to talk and the length of time
required later by the same child to learn to use a foreign language
would probably be found fairly close.
The Digit-Symbol test has been used rather extensively and for many
years as a form of measuring the ability of an individual to learn a new
method of expressing himself. Many experimenters have used a
Letter-Symbol test rather than the Digit-Symbol, but there seems to be
little difference in the character of the results obtained.
The Mentimeter form of the test follows quite closely the corresponding
test in the Beta series used in the Army. At the top of the page there
appears a key showing just what symbol should be used to indicate each
number or digit. The test itself consists of 100 digits with empty
squares appearing below them in which one is to write, beneath each
digit, its corresponding symbol as shown by the key on pages 166 and
167. An intelligent person usually begins with the first digit and
supplies the proper symbol for it at each place it occurs in the test;
then begins with the second digit and goes through the entire test
writing the symbol for it, and so on. Those of average intelligence more
frequently try to supply the proper symbol for each different digit in
order as they appear in the test without going through the entire test
with each symbol separately. The method of the candidate in doing the
work should not, however, be allowed to influence the rating obtained on
the test, except as one method may produce a higher score than another.
Investigations which have been made seem to show that although the
symbols used are quite distinctly more difficult to write than the
digits themselves would be, it is nevertheless a better test to measure
the number of symbols the candidate can write under the digits than to
measure the number of digits one could write correctly under their
corresponding symbols. The relationship between ability in this test and
general ability to handle ideas and abstract notions is rather
remarkably close. It is probable, however, that if the test were
lengthened so as to require five or ten minutes rather than two and one
half minutes the correspondence with intellectual ability would be
increased.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account