Mechanics: The Science of MachineryBond, A. Russell (Alexander Russell)
History
Mechanics: The Science of Machinery
Bond, A. Russell (Alexander Russell)
Machinery; Mechanical engineering; Mechanics
Some idea of the nature of these forces and why they give rise to
precession may be understood by reference to the diagram, Figure 77.
Here we have a disk with a heavy rim turning on the axis X, X′. At
_A_, _B_, _C_ and _D_ are four particles whose flights we are going to
consider. Suppose the wheel to be at rest; then if _X, X′_ is tilted
in the direction of the arrows _x_ _x′_, the wheel will turn about
the line _Y Y′_; _D_ will move forward toward _D′_, and _B_ backward
toward _B′_, but _A_ and _C_ will remain where they are. Now, suppose,
the wheel to be revolving clockwise, or in the direction _A_, _B_,
_C_, _D_, then the particle _A_ will pursue a spiral course that will
bring it to _B′_, and _C_ will pursue a spiral course that will bring
it to _D′_. However, particle _D_ will have an irregular course, as
indicated by the dotted line, starting first to move forward and then
curving back toward _A_. The same will be true of _B_, except in the
reverse direction. The course of particles _D_ and _B_ is, therefore,
materially different from that of _A_ and _C_. Now, the particle
_D_ will resist being deflected from its course and will develop an
opposing force represented by the arrow _d_. A moment later this is
reversed as the particle bends back toward the axis _Y Y′_, and we may
represent the new force by the arrow _d′_. It may be proved that the
force _d′_ is more powerful than that of _d_. The particle _A_ in the
meantime exerts a force opposing its deflection, which is represented
by the arrow _a_. On the other half of the wheel there are similar but
opposite forces, _b_, _b′_ and _c_. The sum of these forces gives the
wheel a tendency to turn about the axis _Z Z′_. To avoid complicating
our diagram with too many arrows, we had better refer to a new diagram
(Figure 78) which shows only the resultant of the forces developed.
The application of the forces _x_ _x′_, which would have turned the
wheel on the axis _Y Y′_, had it been stationary, have resulted in the
development of forces _z_ _z′_ at right angles to _x_ _x′_, tending to
turn the wheel about the axis _Z Z′_. Now, if we go through the same
processes of reasoning as before, it will be evident that the forces
_z_ _z′_ will result in a third set of forces _y_ _y′_ at right angles
to _z_ _z′_ tending to turn the wheel about the axis _Y Y′_. The forces
_y_ _y′_ exactly balance the forces _x_ _x′_, and hence the wheel does
not turn about the axis _Y Y′_ in response to the original forces, but
starts instead to revolve slowly about the axis _Z Z_. Because the
forces _x_ _x′_ and _y_ _y′_ balance each other, there is no fourth
couple developed and hence no opposition to the forces _z_ _z′_.
[Illustration: FIG. 78.--DIAGRAM EXPLAINING PRECESSIONAL MOVEMENT OF A
GYROSCOPE]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account