Mediæval Heresy & the InquisitionTurberville, Arthur Stanley
History
Mediæval Heresy & the Inquisition
Turberville, Arthur Stanley
Heresy; Inquisition; Sects, Medieval
_A History of the Inquisition of Spain_ (New York, 1906-7).
_The Inquisition in the Spanish Dependencies_ (New York, 1908).
_Chapters in the Religious History of Spain connected with the
Inquisition_ (Philadelphia, 1893).
Together, these volumes represent an immense fund of learning and the
most painstaking research. For this reason it will be long indeed
before they are superseded. They have been adversely criticized, as
being marred by strong anti-Catholic prejudice. Colour is undoubtedly
lent to the charge by the rather unfortunate fact that the _History
of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages_ opens with an account of the
abuses of the mediæval Church and that the whole argument of the book
appears as though largely based upon these initial contentions. Lea
is also inclined to be biased in favour of all heretics as against
their persecutors. But while in detail he may be open to criticism
and his attitude is quite clearly Protestant, the great bulk of his
work remains unshaken. The Romanist point of view with regard to it
should, however, be studied. It is summarized, for example, in P. M.
Baumgarten, _H. C. Lea’s Historical Writings: a critical inquiry_ (New
York, 1909), and will be found incidentally in the works of recent
Catholic historians of the Inquisition (_q.v. infra_). There are
admirable _critiques_ of Lea’s work in:
Lord Acton’s _The History of Freedom of Thought and other Essays_
(London, 1909);
P. Frédéricq’s Introduction to the French translation of Lea’s
_History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages_ (tr. S. Reinach,
Paris, 1900, pp. i-xxviii);
and in articles by S. Reinach on his _Spanish Inquisition_ in _Revue
Critique_, No. 18, May 1906, p. 300; No. 42, Oct. 1907, p. 301; No. 5,
Feb. 1908, p. 86.
Recent works from the Romanist standpoint have been:
C. Douais, _L’Inquisition; ses Origines, sa Procédure_ (Paris,
1906).
H. Maillet, _L’Église et la répression sanglante de l’hérésie_
(Liège, 1909).
E. Vacandard, _The Inquisition, a Critical and Historical Study of
the Coercive Powers of the Church_ (tr. B. L. Conway, 1908).
C. Moeller, _Les Bûchers et les Autos-da-fé de l’Inquisition depuis
le Moyen Age in Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique_ (Louvain, 1913,
vol. xiv, pp. 720-51).
Mgr. Douais has done much able and learned work on the history of the
mediæval Inquisition, and the Abbé Vacandard’s book is most moderate
and fair-minded. The most considerable work of scholarship written on
the subject of recent years has, however, been T. de Cauzons, _Histoire
de l’Inquisition en France_ (2 vols., Paris, 1909, 1913, unfinished).
There is a critical survey of some of the most recent work done on
the Inquisition by P. Frédéricq, _Les récents historiens Catholiques
de l’Inquisition en France in Revue historique_, vol. cix, 1912, pp.
307-34. Mainly critical is C. V. Langlois, _L’Inquisition après des
travaux récents_ (Paris, 1902).
IV
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account