[347] _Ibid._, p. 251. [348] Ludovico à Paramo attributes the tranquillity of Spain to the beneficent influence of the Inquisition, _op. cit._, p. 290. [349] Llorente, vol. i, pp. 66-97. [350] Mansi, vol. xxiii, pp. 553-8. [351] See eulogy of Eymeric in Ludovico à Paramo, p. 110. [352] See Lea, vol. ii, pp. 290-315. For Bohemia, see pp. 427-505. [353] _Practica_, pp. 232-3, ‘Diligens ac fervens zelo veritatis fidei et salubris animarum ad detestationem et extirpationem heretice pravitatis.... Inquisitor sit constans: persistat inter pericula et adversa usque ad mortem, pro justitia fidei agonizans, ut non temerarie praesumat per audaciam que periculose precipiat.’ _Cf._ Eymeric, _Directorium_, p. 575, ‘Inquisitor debet esse conversatione honestus, prudentia circumspectus, constantia firmus, sacra doctrina fidei eminenter eruditus et virtutibus circumfultus.’ See also Frédéricq, _Corpus_, vol. i, Nos. 215, 243. [354] _Ibid._, pp. 594, 602; Ludovico à Paramo, p. 106. [355] Limborch, _Historia Inquisitionis_, p. 124, cap. ix; _Directorium_, pp. 631-2. [356] See Lea, vol. i, p. 379. [357] See Vacandard, _op. cit._, p. 139. [358] Douais, _L’Inquisition_, p. 246; De Cauzons, vol. ii, p. 134. [359] Vacandard, p. 142; Lea, vol. i, pp. 388-9. [360] In sentences the name of the bishop preceded that of the inquisitor. Bernard Gui, _Practica_, p. 93. [361] Arnaldo Albertini, _Tractatus de Agnoscendis Assertionibus Catholicis et haereticis_, in F. Zilettus, _op. cit._, vol. xi, pt. ii, pp. 52 _et seq._ [362] See Tanon, p. 218. [363] Vacandard, p. 162. [364] Simancas in Zilettus, vol. xi, pt. ii, pp. 96-7, 104, 122. [365] Moeller, _op. cit._, p. 740. ‘The spirit of the inquisitors is another matter. There is room for distrust of their propensity to discover heresies everywhere. Their _amour propre_ was engaged to discover it under the most puzzling appearances.’ [366] See J. à Royas, _De Haereticis_, in Zilettus, vol. xi, pt. ii, pp. 212-24 (_passim_); Albertini, _op. cit._, p. 53; Ludovico à Paramo, p. 544. See both Royas and Albertini _passim_ on the general question of how to recognize a heretic, also Simancas in tit. xxxi. [367] Simancas, p. 155. [368] Eymeric, _Directorium_, p. 343. ‘Haeretici affirmativi dicti sunt, qui habent eorum quae sunt fidei, errorem in mente, et verbo vel facto ostendunt, se modis praedictis habere pertinaciam in voluntate.’—‘Negativi vero haeretici dicti sunt, qui coram judice fidei per testes legitimos de aliqua haeresi, vel errore, quos nolunt vel non possunt repellere, rite sive juste convicti sunt, sed non confessi, immo in negativa constanter perseverant; verbo fidem catholicam profitentur et detestantur etiam verbo haereticam pravitatem.’ _Cf._ p. 561.