Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The next drawing shows a plan of the third or uppermost floor, at the
level of the clerestory of the chapel. Here the outer wall is shown
perforated all round by a mural gallery, which communicates with the
three well staircases and with the chapel.
Finally follows a vertical section of the whole keep from east to west,
in which is shown the chapel with its clerestory above and its two
tiers of crypts below. These drawings, which more especially belong
to the detailed description of the Tower of London which follows in
its place, are here inserted as illustrating what is written of Norman
rectangular keeps in general.
[Illustration]
The kitchen, though a necessary appendage to a keep, is not often to
be discovered. Probably the cooking was of a simple character, mostly
carried on before an open fire, or by boiling, or broiling over a
brazier. There is a kitchen in the forebuilding at Rochester, high up;
and one at the first-floor level in a mural chamber, at Castle Rising
and at Norwich. The kitchen when it was in a distinct chamber was at
the level of the hall, or even above it.
The defences of the outer doorway in a Norman keep were usually one or
two stout doors of oak, strengthened with iron, and held close by one
or two bars, also of oak, which ran back into deep holes in the wall
about four inches square. The herse or portcullis, though used in other
parts of castles, was rare in the keep. It is a very old method of
defence, formed of stone in the Great Pyramid, and the groove for which
remains in the city gate of Pompeii. When employed, as in the keeps of
Scarborough, Hedingham, and Rochester, it was a single grate, probably
of oak spiked and plated with iron, and it was worked from a mural
chamber over the archway. Sometimes, from the narrow dimensions of the
groove, the grate seems to have been wholly of iron. It was worked by
chains or cords wrapped round a cylinder or windlass, such as is still
in use in the main gate-house of the Tower. Norman keeps very seldom
retain their original parapets or turrets. The parapet was about two
feet thick and five feet high. It was either plain or had broad merlons
and narrow embrasures. Usually it was a mere continuation of the wall,
without corbels or any contrivance to widen the rampart walls, which
were of sufficient thickness for the walk. At Rochester, holes are seen
at the base of the parapet for beams to carry a _brétasche_ or external
gallery, but these probably are not original. The angle turrets are
usually mere places of arms, the rampart walks passing through them.
Sometimes they have an upper floor reached by a stone stair or a
movable ladder.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account