Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
Military engines produced little effect upon it, but a mine
was opened which, says Wendover, first brought down the walls and
then a part of the tower. This is what we now see. The keep seems to
have been repaired in haste at once, the outer wall probably not till
1225, when Henry III. spent considerable sums upon the castle, and the
capping-tower of the curtain is of that date. The attack by sap was
the only one to be employed against a rectangular keep, and was rarely
practicable. Where, as was often the case, the keep stood upon a rock,
the running a mine below it would produce no effect. Where this was not
the case, the foundations of the wall were so broad and so solidified
as to stand even when much of the soil beneath them was removed. At
the White Tower, for example, when it was found convenient to bring a
railway from the river quay into the base of the keep for the shipment
of stores, about 20 feet of solid masonry had to be cut through, and
much earth removed, and this, with every aid, was found to be a very
tedious and expensive operation. The defence of such a keep was its
passive strength alone. The loops were nothing in its defence; the roof
being on a slope and of shingle would support no military engine and
no great store of stones or heavy missiles. The narrow doorway did not
allow of a sally in force, and when seriously attacked the garrison had
no resource but to trust to the thickness of their walls, their ample
supply of water, their magazines of provisions, and thus patiently to
await relief.
Such are the details of the rectangular Norman keeps, of which we have
in England about fifty extant or well-recorded examples, dating from
the year 1078, when the White Tower was begun, to about the year 1180,
to which may be attributed the keep of Helmsley.
LIST (APPROXIMATIVE) OF RECTANGULAR KEEPS IN ENGLAND.
_Cheshire._—Chester.
_Cornwall._—Carnbrè (?).
_Cumberland._—Carlisle.
_Derbyshire._—Castleton.
_Devon._—Okehampton (?).
_Dorset._—Corfe, Sherborne.
_Durham._—Norham.
_Essex._—Colchester, Hedingham, Walden.
_Gloucestershire._—Bristol (destroyed).
_Hants._—Christchurch, Porchester, Wolvesey.
_Hereford._—Goderich.
_Kent._—Canterbury, Dover, Malling, Rochester, Thurnham.
_Lancashire._—Clitheroe, Lancaster.
_Middlesex._—The Tower.
_Monmouth._—Chepstow.
_Norfolk._—Bungay, Castle Rising, Mileham, Norwich.
_Northumberland._—Bamburgh, Mitford, Newcastle, Prudhoe.
_Nottingham._—Nottingham (destroyed).
_Salop._—Bridgnorth, Clun, Ludlow, Wattlesborough.
_Somerset._—Taunton.
_Surrey._—Guildford.
_Sussex._—Bramber.
_Wales._—Ogmore, Penllyne.
_Warwickshire._—Kenilworth.
_Westmoreland._—Appleby, Brough, Brougham.
_Yorkshire._—Bowes, Helmsley, Middleham, Normanby (?), Richmond,
Scarborough.
CHAPTER X.
OF THE SHELL KEEP.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account