Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
Besides any other approaches, it is evident that the curtain was always
made use of as one way to the keep, and at Arundel and Tamworth is
still so used, the parapet in front and rear protecting the rampart
walk. As, however, it was a fundamental rule in Norman castles that
the keep, the final retreat, however many its approaches, should have
as few entrances as possible, the curtain usually stopped at the top
level of the mound, and was continued only as a parapet, so that those
who came along the wall had, on reaching the keep, to pass along its
outside a greater or less distance before they reached the doorway.
This is well seen at Tamworth. At Arundel the wall is raised to the
full height of the keep, as at Lincoln, but this is not usual. At
Hawarden the curtain is continued 10 feet or 12 feet high, and so abuts
upon the keep, but the rampart walk does not communicate with it.
The position of the well in these keeps has already been noticed. At
York and Tickhill it is within the area. That at Arundel is in a tower
outside the wall, but a part of it. That at Berkeley is also in a
tower, a part of the wall. Those of Alnwick and Kilpeck are in the wall
itself; those of Cardiff and Wallingford at the foot of the mound, just
within the ditch.
It is much to be regretted that so few of these shell keeps remain,
even in ruin, and very few, indeed, in a state at all approaching
to their original condition, for, as the representatives of a very
early form of fortification, and as the chief seats of very ancient
estates, and of original English families, they possess a very peculiar
interest. Nor are they, when of large size, at all wanting in a noble
effect. It is true that upon level ground, as that occupied by the
Tower of London, or upon such a ridge as Corfe, or such an elevated
platform as Hedingham, the rectangular keep produces a very fine
effect, but there are positions in which this is fully equalled by the
keeps of the other type. At Durham, where the central tower of the
cathedral is equal in grandeur and simplicity to a rectangular keep,
it is eclipsed by the adjacent castle. The keep of Belvoir, which,
though rebuilt and weak in its details, retains its original outline,
would be ill exchanged for the towers even of Norham or Lancaster, and
no other structure could be substituted to advantage for the keep of
Windsor, crowning and completing its “tiara of proud towers.” Massive
as is the rectangular keep, simple, uncompromising, and warlike its
features, still, even when seen to its greatest advantage, as on the
promontory of Dover or the bold impregnable rock of Bamburgh, it must
be confessed to be inferior in grandeur and in completeness of outline
to the stern round tower of other days, identified as it is with the
early residences of the adventurous Northmen who laid the foundations
of the English people.
LIST (APPROXIMATIVE) OF SHELL KEEPS, PAST OR PRESENT.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account