Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
By degrees, as the Norman towers and shell-keeps fell out of fashion,
they were succeeded by towers of a cylindrical form, known as Donjons
or Juliets, and this change corresponds to the middle period of the
Early English style in ecclesiastical architecture. Scientifically,
in a military point of view, this was scarcely an advance, for the
defenders of an isolated round tower could not concentrate their fire,
and could only protect the foot of the wall by exposing themselves at
its summit. On the other hand, with equal material, the round tower
was stronger, and more difficult to breach or to bring down by a
mine. Also, it admitted of being vaulted in every story, and was thus
more solid and less exposed than the rectangular keep to being set on
fire, either from within or by balls projected upon its conical roof.
Usually, however, in England, only the basement was vaulted, as at
Brunless. At Pembroke, the great round tower is vaulted at its summit,
as are some of the cylindrical towers in the _enceinte_; but it is
possible that these elevated vaults may be additions. At Coningsborough
the basement alone is vaulted, and the vault is entered by a ladder
from an aperture in the centre of the dome, under which is the well;
the basement, as in Norman and Early English towers generally, being
used as a store-chamber, and seldom, if ever, as a prison. In fact,
in a single tower, whether rectangular or cylindrical, intended by
its passive strength to defy attacks and to wear out the patience of
a blockading force, an ample store of provisions was of the first
consequence, and to their storage all the spare space was necessarily
devoted. In those days, when the keep was the citadel, and not
unfrequently used as such, prisoners were not kept within its walls.
Dungeons there were none, save in a very few exceptional cases, and the
basement or ground-floor was invariably occupied as a magazine.
These donjons were usually entered at the first-floor level, either
by an exterior stone stair or by one of timber; or sometimes, as at
Pembroke, by a drawbridge, which dropped upon a detached pier, whence
an inclined plane or a flight of steps descended to the ground level.
In their elevated entrance, and in some other respects, these donjons
recall the isolated towers erected during the decline of the Roman
Empire, of which a good example, but square, remains at Autun. There
are only two instances in England of the application of a fore-building
to cover the entrance of these towers, but these—Chilham near
Canterbury, and Orford in Suffolk—are late Norman, not Early English.
Dolbadarn, in North Wales, a rather later tower, but cylindrical, has
an exterior stair of stone, which, however, may be an addition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account