Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The first characteristic of a concentric castle is the arrangement of
its lines of defence, one within the other, two or even three deep,
with towers at the angles and along the walls, so planned that no part
is left entirely to its own defences. A wall cannot be advantageously
defended unless so arranged that the exterior base of one part can be
seen and commanded from the summit of another. A Norman keep or an
Early English round tower could only be defended by the projection
of missiles from the battlements, exposing those who discharged
almost as much as those who received them. The employment of mural
towers not only added to the passive strength of the wall whence
they projected, but when placed within a bowshot distance enabled
the defenders, themselves protected, to enfilade the intermediate
curtain. By this means the curtain wall, that part of the work least
able to withstand the strokes of the ram, became that in defence of
which most projectiles could be brought to bear, whilst the towers,
which from their distance apart were but imperfectly flanked, were
from their form and solidity in little danger of being breached. By
this means also material was economised. The walls were less thick,
and the defence generally was carried on with more skill and less
dependence upon passive strength. In this indeed there was nothing
new, but not the less the principle was ignored in the construction
both of keep-towers and their successors, the round towers, donjons,
or juliets. But in the concentric system a good deal more than this
was effected. The parts of the lines of defence were so arranged that
the garrison could sally from one part, and so harass the attack upon
another. Moreover each part, tower or gatehouse, and sometimes each
stage of a building, was so contrived that it could be held separately
for a short time. Also, from the concentric arrangement of the lines,
a breach of the outer wall did not involve the loss of the place. The
second ward, as at Beaumaris, Harlech, Caerphilly, or the Tower, was
so narrow that in the event of its being entered from a breach, the
assailants were exposed to an attack on either flank, in such a manner
that their greater number could not be brought to bear, nor was there
room to work a catapult or set up a malvoisin. In these castles, the
keep, the main feature in a Norman or an Early English fortress, was
dispensed with; it was developed, to speak anatomically, into an open
court, strengthened at its sides and angles by gatehouses and mural
towers, and having the hall and domestic apartments ranged against the
wall along one or two sides. Around this inner ward was disposed a
second ward, of narrow breadth, and broken up by cross walls. Sometimes
around this second ward was disposed a third or outer ward, usually
of large area, so as to accommodate the greater part of the garrison,
the horses, and the neighbouring peasants with their cattle. In many
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account