Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The portal arch, wide enough to admit a wain, or three men-at-arms
abreast, was usually of the form known as “drop.” Within, the first
defence was a herse or portcullis, and behind it a door of two leaves,
opening inwards, and, when closed, held by one or two stout bars of
oak, which could be pushed back into cavities in the wall. Behind the
door the vaulting was often replaced by a flat roof of timber, through
which worked a second portcullis, and then came two lateral doorways
opening into porters’ lodges, usually connected with a small prison.
At St. Briavels the lodge doors are portcullised. At the end of the
boarded space the vault recommenced, and there was a second pair of
doors and a second portcullis. These two were intended against assaults
from within, each gatehouse being constructed for an independent
defence.
Usually, in addition to these gates and doors, the vault was pierced
with from one to five square or round holes, about a foot across,
called “meurtrières.” These might serve to hold posts to check the
entrance of a body of men, or for thrusting pikes down upon them. They
have also been supposed to be intended to allow water to be poured
down, supposing the passage filled with bushes set on fire, though it
is difficult to see how any quantity of water could be obtained, any
more than melted lead or pitch, which are spoken of. The first floor of
the larger gatehouses contained a handsome chamber with lateral doors
leading to the ramparts of the curtain, and sometimes, as at Caerphilly
and the Tower, to an oratory. The portcullises were worked through the
floor, and their tackle must have given an air of warlike reality to
the room, like the guns in a state-cabin at sea. At Caerphilly and
Chepstow the passage to the curtains is protected by a portcullis and a
drawbridge, of which the pit is a deep hollow in the wall.
The walls of these Edwardian castles varied from 25 to 40 feet in
height and were from 6 to 8 feet thick, or even more, to allow of mural
galleries, as at Chepstow, Caerphilly, and Beaumaris. Upon their top
was a path called the “allure,” or rampart walk, protected in front
by an embattled parapet, and in the rear by lower and lighter walls.
Frequently there was a loop in each merlon, and each embrasure was
fitted with a hanging shutter, both of which are seen at Chepstow.
Where the curtain crosses a ward or projects as a spur, as at
Caerphilly and Beaumaris, it was embattled on both faces. The ramparts
were usually reached from the adjacent mural towers, but sometimes,
as at Warwick, by an open staircase of stone. Occasionally, where a
wall is too slight to allow of a rampart wall, it was, in time of war,
provided with a platform of wood, like a builder’s scaffold. This seems
to have been the case with the city wall of York where it bounds the
cathedral garden.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account