Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
Taking London as the centre, military and political, of the kingdom,
we have, upon the Thames, the Tower, the first and chief fortress
founded by the Conqueror, and which he considered sufficient to
protect and overawe the city. In the city itself, also upon the banks
of the Thames, near the outlet of the Flete, was Baynard’s Castle,
the stronghold of the Barons Fitz-Walter, standard-bearers to the
City of London, and an important branch of the House of Clare. At
various distances from this centre, according to the disposition of
the ground, were posted within the northern and southern passes of the
chalk ridge, Berkhampstead, an appanage of the earldom of Cornwall, and
Guildford, the early keep of which stands in part upon an artificial
mound. Also, to the immediate south of London, were the episcopal
castle, still inhabited, of Farnham, and Earl Warenne’s castle on
the hill at Reigate, of which some traces remain. Higher up the
Thames were Windsor, Reading, Wallingford, and Oxford, all fortresses
of high antiquity and of the first rank. Between the Thames and the
sea-coast the country was well guarded, and the communications with
Dover, Portsmouth, and Southampton, so important to sovereigns with
possessions on the Continent, rendered secure. Dover, called by William
the Conqueror, according to Matthew Paris, “Clavis et repagulum,”
the key and bolt of the kingdom, was one of its oldest, largest,
and strongest fortresses, and covered a nearly impregnable area of
thirty-five acres. It crowned the crest of a chalk rock which seemed to
rise out of the sea, and steep by nature was rendered still more so by
art, and bore traces of Norman, English, Roman, and probably British
occupation. Its well of water is particularly specified, according to
M. Paris, in Harold’s celebrated covenant with Duke William. Indeed,
there seem to have been two wells in the keep, besides another, no
doubt that of Harold, in the outer ward, probably a Roman work. The
town also was walled. In the rear of Dover lay the city of Canterbury,
mentioned in “Domesday” as fortified. It was strong to the landward,
with a formidable bank and ditch, revetted by a Norman wall, and
towards the water was covered by the marshes of the Stour, at one time
navigable up to the quays of the ancient city. At one angle and just
within the area, was a strong rectangular keep, a Norman addition, and
near it was the Danejohn, a far older moated mound, older even than
the bank and ditch of the city, which were laid out at an angle to
include it. Near to Canterbury was Chilham, a Norman tower of peculiar
form, on the site of a work burned by the Danes in 838-51; and at no
great distance was Saltwood, given to the see of Canterbury in 1036,
and said to owe the formidable banks and ditches which still surround
it to a son of Hengist. West of Dover William d’Abrincis had built the
castle of Folkestone, now, with the cliff it stood upon, swallowed
up by the sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account