Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 1 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
name, appropriately transported from his Norman castle, alone remains,
and but little more of Castle-Carey, the Lovell seat, besieged and
taken by Stephen, or of the Norman keep of Harptree, in a pass in the
Mendip range.
Of importance beyond all these more or less local castles was that of
Bristol, founded by Robert, Earl of Gloucester, but found too valuable
to be intrusted to his successors in the earldom. Its square Norman
keep stood between the Frome and the Avon, and was strong both in works
and in position. After centuries of contest for its possession between
the earls of Gloucester and the Crown, it ceased to be of military
value and was taken down. Upon and beyond the Tamar, as at Montacute,
Wallingford, and Berkhampstead, may be traced the footsteps of the
powerful noble who held the great earldom of Cornwall. Their principal
Cornish castles,—Trematon, Launceston, where the town also was walled,
and Restormel,—were the work originally of Robert, half-brother of
the Conqueror. Their remains are considerable, and their strength and
position were such as to give them immense influence in that wild and
almost impenetrable district. St. Michael’s Mount remains strongly
fortified; Carnbrea, the work of Ralph de Pomeroy, still marks the
rocky ridge whence it derives its name, and there are traces of
Boscastle, the hold of the Barons Botreaux, and of the Arthurian castle
of Tintagel. There are besides in Cornwall a few fortified houses, and
a multitude of strong places,—camps rather than castles, very peculiar
in character, and probably the work of the native Cornish before the
arrival of the stranger.
It appears, then, that south of and upon the Thames and Bristol Avon
there stood, at the close of the twelfth century, at least eighty-nine
more or less considerable castles, a very large number of which
were kept in repair by the sheriffs of the counties and governed by
castellans appointed by the king and holding office during pleasure. Of
these, at least thirty contained shell keeps placed on moated mounds,
and were in some form or other far older than the Conquest; and about
seventeen were characterised by rectangular keeps, of which two only,
Guildford and Christchurch, were associated with mounds, and of these
very few indeed were of pure Norman foundation. Of the remaining
forty-two the particulars are doubtful, so they cannot be counted
with one class or the other, but most of them are also older than the
Conquest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account