Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
In the Inquisitions and Escheats are also some entries. From an
inquisition, 3 Edward I., Robert de Monte Alto is seized of the manor
of Hawardine, co. Cest. His possessions were extensive. They occupy
ninety-one entries in thirteen counties. [Inq. p.m. I. 55.] In the next
year, 4 Edward I., is an inquisition, whence it appears that the manor
was never settled in dower. Neither Leuca, wife of Robert de Montalt
the Black, nor Matilda, wife of Ralph de Montalt, nor Nicholaa, wife of
Roger de Montalt the elder, nor Cecilia, wife of Roger the younger—all
ladies of the Honour of Hawirdyn—were ever so endowed. [Ib. 60, Cal.
Geneal. I. 247.] 10 Edward I., 25 March, is an entry on the Welsh roll
concerning the pursuing and taking certain Welsh malefactors, who
took captive Roger de Clifford in the king’s castles of Hawardin and
Flint [Ayloffe, p. 76], and from the king’s writ itself of that date,
addressed to Roger de Mortimer, and given at length by Mr. Hartshorne,
it appears that the Welsh attacked Hawarden by night, killed some of
De Clifford’s household, and burnt the castle houses, and did much
the same at Flint. This outrage was repeated in the next year, when
(6 November, 1282) the justice’s elder son, also Roger Clifford, was
slain. [Foss’s “Judges,” III. 76.] The next entry in the inquisition
is one of 25 Edward I. on Roger de Montalt, whence it appears that at
that time, though he held Castle Rising, &c., the manor of Hauwerthyn
was vested in Thomas de Offeleye. This might, however, be as feoffee in
trust. [Inq. p.m. I. 134.]
From all this it may be inferred that there was a castle here which
Prince Llewelyn destroyed, and which Robert de Montalt undertook not
to rebuild. Such promises went for as little then as between nations
at the present day, and the castle that the Welsh took 10 Edward II.,
1282, was of course built or restored during that period. If Llewelyn
had found a keep of anything at all approaching in substance to the
present he could scarcely have destroyed it; nor does it seem probable,
from the internal evidence of the building, that the keep now standing
was the work taken by the Welsh, 10 Edward I. Its mouldings and the
plan of its upper floor point to a rather later date; and probably
it was the work of the last Baron de Montalt, between 1297 and 1329.
Cylindrical keep towers, of a pattern not unlike that of Hawarden,
though usually, as at Coucy, on a much larger scale, were in use in
France in the earlier part of the thirteenth century; and although the
unusual thickness of the walls in the present example might be thought
more in keeping with the Norman period, the general details, the
polygonal mural gallery and interior, and the entrance, evidently parts
of the original work, are very decidedly Edwardian.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account