Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The earthworks of the upper ward have unfortunately been destroyed,
the mound and banks thrown into the ditches, and all made level and
much built over. The site of the mound is occupied by an enclosed
three-cornered kitchen garden. The well or spring spoken of as St.
Ethelred’s remains. It opens behind the museum building about 50 feet
from the river, and 6 feet or 8 feet above it. As it is described as
being further north, it is probable that when the ditch was filled up a
pipe was laid to bring the water out at its original level. This ward
contained the mound known as the Castle Hill, and which seems to have
been removed early in the present century. It was girded at the base
by a polygonal curtain wall, outside of which was the ditch. It is
difficult clearly to understand how the mound was occupied. Leland says
“there was one great tower in the inner warde.” Sir Henry Slingsby, in
his diary, in 1645, describes Hereford city as not much unlike York,
“for it hath a round tower mounted upon a hill, like to Clifford’s
Tower, and the mills near it, with some little works about, having the
river Wye running close by; but the walls, though they be high, yet
are not mounted upon a ramp, as York walls are.” This is intelligible
enough, the walls spoken of having been at the base of the hill; but
Leland speaks also of a donjon or keep, of what plan is unknown; but
upon its wall ten half-round towers, and within, what appears to have
been a square tower of considerable height, in the base of which was a
dungeon. We may safely conclude from Sir Henry Slingsby’s very clear
account that the mound carried, like Cardiff and Kilpeck, a shell keep;
but this could scarcely have been furnished with ten half-round towers.
These probably belonged to the _enceinte_ wall below. The keep was
entered, it seems, from the south-east side by a flight of steep steps
up the mound. In the mound was a well, lined with stone, as at York.
The castle ditches were wide, deep, and filled with water, not from
the river, or but partially so, but from a brook, which seems to have
fed the city ditch on this side, and on reaching the castle at the
north-east angle to have divided, a part running direct along the east
front of the lower ward, to the river, and the other part supplying the
north ditch, and the ditch which divided the upper from the lower ward,
and the ditch which passed round the east side of the ward, and divided
it from the cathedral precinct. This latter ditch also received some
little contribution from St. Ethelred’s Well, a spring on the north
side of the upper ward, already mentioned. The castle mill stood at the
junction of the eastern ditch with the Wye. The water in the castle
ditches was, of course, penned back for the use of the mill, and to
strengthen the defences, and it seems to have flowed back upon the city
ditch as far as St. Owen’s Gate, thus strengthening and connecting the
city and the castle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account