Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The inference suggested by the present earthworks is something to the
following effect:—Originally advantage was taken of a natural knoll, of
an irregular figure, but about 300 yards north and south by 125 yards
east and west, which was surrounded by a single ditch, or, where the
ground allowed, by a scarp only. It may be that here, as partially at
Malvern, and in other examples, this long enclosure was subdivided
by two cross cuts into three parts, of which the central formed the
citadel. This would probably be the work of the British.
Then it would seem that a later people, the English, took possession,
and threw up a mound at one corner of the citadel, isolating it by
its proper circular ditch, the principal dwelling being on the mound,
and the horseshoe remainder below containing the base court for the
dependents, while the north and southern portions would serve for
protected enclosures for cattle.
When the Normans took possession they seem to have built a shell keep
upon the mound, and to have employed the base court below as an outer
ward, probably surrounding the whole with a stone wall, now removed,
and replacing the English stockade. This would constitute the castle
proper, to which the north and south platforms would be appendages, no
doubt stockaded for cattle.
The history of Kilpeck commences with Domesday, which records, “Hæ
villæ vel terræ subscriptæ sitæ sunt in fine Arcenefelde. Will’us
filius Normanni tenet Chipcete. Cadiand tenuit tempore Regis Edwardi.”
The church is decidedly older than the masonry of the keep, and it may
therefore be that the early Norman lords contented themselves with a
residence and defences of timber, and did not build for a century or
so after their occupation, when the shell keep was constructed. It is
not probable that this was preceded by any earlier work in masonry, as
Norman buildings were substantial and durable.
The church has been the subject of a “monograph.” The priory, of which
not a trace remains, stood in a field south-east of the castle and
village.
Chipcete in Irchenfield is the present Kilpeck, where William Fitz
Norman sat in the seat of Cadiand, the dispossessed Englishman. The
lands paid no geld or military service, which in that border district
is remarkable. William was a large Herefordshire landowner. In 1134,
25 Henry I., Hugh, son of William Fitz Norman, gave to St. Peter’s,
Gloucester, the church of St. David at Kilpeck, and the chapel of our
Lady of or within the castle. Of the chapel no more is said, but the
church is included in the confirmation charter by Stephen to Gloucester
in 1138, and in many later confirmations and charters of Inspeximus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account