Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)Clark, George Thomas
History
Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2)
Clark, George Thomas
Architecture -- England; Architecture, Medieval; Military architecture
The great gate in Quarry Street, though large, is at present a mere
opening, perhaps of the age of Henry III., in an older, and probably
Norman, curtain. Whether it was connected with the gatehouse is
uncertain, but there is, as already stated, an indication in the
masonry that such was the case. Also the portcullis groove is large,
and so heavy a grate could not have been worked without a chamber above
carrying a winch. Outside the gate are two buttresses, which have a
late Norman aspect. One is nearly perfect, the other has been replaced
in brick, but probably upon the old base. The south-west angle of the
Quarry Street front is marked by the not inconsiderable remains of
the postern tower, adjacent wall, and a large buttress, all pretty
clearly late Norman. Towards the north and east the walls are entirely
removed, but in these quarters the line of the ditch affords a clue to
the original boundary. The _enceinte_ thus laid down measures about
535 yards; its greatest north and south diameter, 170 yards; and east
and west, 140 yards. The Quarry Street front is straight and 138 yards
long, with the gate nearly in the middle. From the postern tower to the
end of the keep causeway is 213 yards, and thence to the “King’s Head”
angle, 184 yards.
Captain James has detected traces of a line of wall parallel to, and
about 30 yards south of, the High Street, which may not improbably have
been the boundary of an enclosed area appended to the castle, as may
the extra-parochial lands on the east and south-east, but the actually
defended area of the castle seems to have been as above described.
It may further be observed that Quarry Street, which runs along the
foot of the west wall of the castle and lay between it and the river,
seems to have been defended on that side by the low cliff and talus
already mentioned, supported probably by the retaining wall, of which
traces and the jamb of a gate remain; while there is a tradition of a
gate crossing the street near the postern of the castle, which probably
guarded the approach to the town from the south, the only quarter from
which a hostile approach would be apprehended.
Not only are the remains of the domestic buildings of a late Norman
character, but among the repairs of the hall, in the reign of Henry
III., two of the piers are mentioned as out of the perpendicular, a
tolerably conclusive evidence that the hall resembled Oakham and
Leicester and was of Norman date. Altogether, it is sufficiently
evident that the whole area of the castle was enclosed by its original
founder, and is not later than the middle of the twelfth century, the
detached fragments of walls and buildings being in substance of the
same date with the keep. The castle is in St. Mary’s parish, bordered
on the north-east by Trinity and on the east by the extra-parochial
plot, the origin of which is not known. Probably the _enceinte_ took in
the whole of the residence of the royal Saxon owners.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account